I’ve been watching since 71/72
This is technically the best side by quite some way.
Will be interesting to see how we get on when we go up.
Posted By: paddonwasjesus on February 18th 2019 at 12:57:02
Message Thread
- Anyone else think the current team are playing the most attractive football ever for City? (NCFC) - essexcanary, Feb 17, 20:47:26
- I’ve been watching since 71/72 (NCFC) - paddonwasjesus, Feb 18, 12:57:02
- Yes (NCFC) - Black Creosote Time, Feb 17, 23:06:09
- It's pretty sexy, that's for sure (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 17, 22:44:59
- yep, for sure. (n/m) (NCFC) - shoddy, Feb 17, 22:53:07
- I'd venture they are on a par with Stringer's best passing side... (NCFC) - Worthing Yellow, Feb 17, 22:29:36
- My dad and I were saying that the other day (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 17, 22:09:25
- Imagine if you’d decided to write this team (and the entire club) off after a few games. (NCFC) - lurd, Feb 17, 22:03:18
- The only potential rival is the Stringer/Walker era (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Feb 17, 22:01:48
- Yes. By far. And sexier than most premier league teams at the moment too (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Feb 17, 21:52:18
- No question for me. (NCFC) - norway, Feb 17, 21:09:40
- Well never get a season like this again unfortunately whatever the end result (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Feb 17, 21:50:52
- Wheel (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Feb 17, 21:51:05
- The 6 goals against blades and Bolton (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 17, 21:24:56
- Well never get a season like this again unfortunately whatever the end result (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Feb 17, 21:50:52
- For me, absolutely. I've been watching properly since 1992 (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 17, 21:05:13
- It's close. The Stringer team from late 80's/early 90's played some lovely stuff. (n/m) (NCFC) - col canary, Feb 17, 20:57:46
- Nothing like this (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Feb 17, 21:50:06
- So the current team is better than the class of 92/93 and the subsequent team (NCFC) - pants, Feb 17, 22:16:20
- By the way, the the question had been “better” then I’d be tempted to day (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Feb 17, 23:17:23
- Players would evolve and still be good enough in my opinion (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 17, 23:54:08
- Ffs. If. Say. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Feb 17, 23:17:41
- “Better” wasn’t the question; “most attractive” was the question (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 17, 22:24:12
- Is this not dangerous territory? (NCFC) - pants, Feb 17, 22:35:59
- No. This is when we need to enjoy it. We will not have another season like this! (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Feb 17, 23:14:11
- You’re right - we’d best not enjoy it too much. (n/m) (NCFC) - Dog, Feb 17, 22:49:59
- Is this not dangerous territory? (NCFC) - pants, Feb 17, 22:35:59
- By the way, the the question had been “better” then I’d be tempted to day (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Feb 17, 23:17:23
- So the current team is better than the class of 92/93 and the subsequent team (NCFC) - pants, Feb 17, 22:16:20
- Nothing like this (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Feb 17, 21:50:06
- I have been watching since early 70's and I cannot remember a more attractive team. (NCFC) - Men without hats, Feb 17, 20:57:19
- I think the team we had under stringer and also walker first time we played great footbal (NCFC) - pinkney, Feb 17, 21:07:00
- I think the team we had in theunder stringer (n/m) (NCFC) - pinkney, Feb 17, 21:03:39
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.