Anyone else think the current team are playing the most attractive football ever for City?

Not saying they are the best ever team, but going back to the 70s when I first started watching I can't think of any team that play such beautiful football as we play at the moment. I still think somebody is going to be on the end of a 7 or 8 nil this season when we take all the chances we make

Posted By: essexcanary on February 17th 2019 at 20:47:26

Message Thread

Anyone else think the current team are playing the most attractive football ever for City? (NCFC) - essexcanary, Feb 17, 20:47:26
- I’ve been watching since 71/72 (NCFC) - paddonwasjesus, Feb 18, 12:57:02
- Yes (NCFC) - Black Creosote Time, Feb 17, 23:06:09
- It's pretty sexy, that's for sure (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 17, 22:44:59
  - yep, for sure. (n/m) (NCFC) - shoddy, Feb 17, 22:53:07
- I'd venture they are on a par with Stringer's best passing side... (NCFC) - Worthing Yellow, Feb 17, 22:29:36
- My dad and I were saying that the other day (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 17, 22:09:25
- Imagine if you’d decided to write this team (and the entire club) off after a few games. (NCFC) - lurd, Feb 17, 22:03:18
- The only potential rival is the Stringer/Walker era (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Feb 17, 22:01:48
- Yes. By far. And sexier than most premier league teams at the moment too (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Feb 17, 21:52:18
- No question for me. (NCFC) - norway, Feb 17, 21:09:40
  - Well never get a season like this again unfortunately whatever the end result (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Feb 17, 21:50:52
    - Wheel (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Feb 17, 21:51:05
  - The 6 goals against blades and Bolton (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 17, 21:24:56
- For me, absolutely. I've been watching properly since 1992 (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 17, 21:05:13
- It's close. The Stringer team from late 80's/early 90's played some lovely stuff. (n/m) (NCFC) - col canary, Feb 17, 20:57:46
  - Nothing like this (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Feb 17, 21:50:06
    - So the current team is better than the class of 92/93 and the subsequent team (NCFC) - pants, Feb 17, 22:16:20
      - By the way, the the question had been “better” then I’d be tempted to day (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Feb 17, 23:17:23
        
        Players would evolve and still be good enough in my opinion (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 17, 23:54:08
        
        Ffs. If. Say. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Feb 17, 23:17:41
      - “Better” wasn’t the question; “most attractive” was the question (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 17, 22:24:12
        
        Is this not dangerous territory? (NCFC) - pants, Feb 17, 22:35:59
        
        No. This is when we need to enjoy it. We will not have another season like this! (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Feb 17, 23:14:11
        
        You’re right - we’d best not enjoy it too much. (n/m) (NCFC) - Dog, Feb 17, 22:49:59
- I have been watching since early 70's and I cannot remember a more attractive team. (NCFC) - Men without hats, Feb 17, 20:57:19
  - I think the team we had under stringer and also walker first time we played great footbal (NCFC) - pinkney, Feb 17, 21:07:00
  - I think the team we had in theunder stringer (n/m) (NCFC) - pinkney, Feb 17, 21:03:39

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.