More competive means fewer points needed

2 years ago 60 points had you 5 points adrift of top 2 in 4th

Posted By: SCC 28 on February 14th 2019 at 11:54:14

Message Thread

How many points do we need? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 14, 11:38:40
- 1 more than the 3rd placed team would do me (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Feb 14, 20:00:05
- I would say 10 wins out of the 14 games would be enough (n/m) (NCFC) - pinkney, Feb 14, 12:56:18
- I reckon 85. The two teams that worry me most are Blades and Bristol City. (n/m) (NCFC) - MORDENCANARY, Feb 14, 12:39:04
  - I think Bristol City will drop off but the Blades worry me (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 14, 13:08:14
    - Blades and Baggies are the ones who worry me (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 14, 15:10:54
- Don't worry (NCFC) - Monty Peculiar, Feb 14, 11:50:22
  - Should finish above Ipswich anyway (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 14, 11:55:49
- 90+ for top two based on recent seasons (NCFC) - inutero, Feb 14, 11:45:50
  - 85/86 should comfortably do it. In the last 18 yrs no team with 90 has failed to go up. (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 14, 12:29:15
    - Yeah and we had 83 going into the final (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 14, 12:48:22
      - game under Lambert (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 14, 12:48:40
  - More competive means fewer points needed (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 14, 11:54:14
    - I'll take your word for it (NCFC) - inutero, Feb 14, 12:24:28
      - He's right (NCFC) - CauldRon, Feb 14, 12:29:46
- 60 points the lowest 2nd place total (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 14, 11:45:46
- Preston still have play off ambitions (NCFC) - CauldRon, Feb 14, 11:43:34
  - Best of the bunch to lose IMO (NCFC) - mr chimp, Feb 14, 13:01:05
    - re Wolves - it's probably because we didn't dick them last season (NCFC) - mr carra, Feb 14, 14:59:00

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.