Based on your posts - you don't like him. That's it really.

As I've already said, you direct criticism at him personally. You name him if something goes wrong. If things are going well, you don't mention him.

Earlier you posted this very particular anti-Webber message:

User Posted Link

This is hardly the greatest sleuthing Jim. It's just literally the words that you say.

You are inherently negative about Webber.

Posted By: norway on October 9th 2018 at 17:52:17

Message Thread

Statement (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 13:12:45
- 'as a rum'n intut. (n/m) (NCFC) - Dunney, Oct 9, 13:51:55
- Hmm. That’s hardly going to stop speculation about what’s gone on (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 13:16:35
- So stone out Webber in? (n/m) (NCFC) - Pukki Pies, Oct 9, 13:15:33
- And another (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 9, 13:15:27
  - This I’m not so keen on. Webber extending his clutches. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 13:18:22
    - Jim, you're all over this like a horse in a nosebag. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 13:29:54
      - Hehe (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Oct 9, 13:45:30
      - I just think some of our problems towards the end under McNally were due to (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 13:37:41
        
        doesn't this new structure do the opposite re control? (NCFC) - CWC, Oct 9, 14:11:29
        
        Probably not when two of the three are husband and wife... (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 9, 14:24:46
        
        yes, so I see (NCFC) - CWC, Oct 9, 14:46:46
        
        NEVER!!! (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 9, 15:39:33
        
        indeed (NCFC) - CWC, Oct 9, 16:57:39
        
        You do absolutely despise Webber though for some reason. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 13:44:08
        
        I’ve never said the others weren’t good signings and I don’t have an issue with (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 13:45:59
        
        Slippery. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 13:47:14
        
        Good to see Norway chasing jim as usual (NCFC) - Men without hats, Oct 9, 14:26:37
        
        He's trying, politely, to get him to justify his stance towards Webber. Perfectly (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Oct 9, 15:21:53
        
        I've justified it several times, he just doesn't accept my reasoning (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 15:26:40
        
        I just don't think you give him a fair crack of the whip Jim. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 16:10:18
        
        What is my position on him then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 17:18:15
        
        Based on your posts - you don't like him. That's it really. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 17:52:17
        
        Don't be tiresome. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 14:33:07
        
        Calling someone slippery often considered rude or insulting (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 9, 15:32:25
        
        Ok 👍 (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 15:37:27
        
        Webber seems to be doing a good job though no ?... (NCFC) - loz, Oct 9, 13:41:24
        
        Indeed, and McNally also did a good job at the time we needed him. Businesses change and (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Oct 9, 13:44:13
        
        Some people need the drama. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 13:45:58
        
        VMT. Into every life a little rain must fall... and if it's dry, well I can always drive.. (NCFC) - Pixelman, Oct 9, 14:38:22
        
        Hard to tell really isn’t it. Yes our first team recruitment seems to have been decent (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 13:43:50
        
        McNally never really got recruitment right, with a few shining exceptions it was mediocre (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Oct 9, 13:47:26
        
        At this level I think he did. Struggled when he tried to move to a higher calibre of (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 13:55:15
        
        Hang on though (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Oct 9, 13:58:10
        
        no idea, he seemed to be doing pretty much everything by the end (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 14:01:34
        
        Hmmmm. Show your working. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Oct 9, 14:03:21
        
        Well whether or not the academy has had any positive influence yet from (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Oct 9, 13:47:09
        
        Your criticism of Webber is always without caveats. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 13:45:11
        
        I don;t think that true. I haven;t got time to go through my old posts but (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 14:00:47
        
        You've not praised HIM for signings. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 14:13:31
        
        Not sure I did actually. I slated him for allowing us to go into the season with Husband (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 14:33:45
        
        You called his signing "a horrific failure from Webber" (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 14:42:35
        
        Not wishing to be picky but I wasn;t describing his signing there more the (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 14:45:26
        
        We can agree to disagree here. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 14:53:33
        
        funnily enough (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 9, 13:53:58
        
        It's not an unreasonable point re player sales. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 14:10:18
        
        hahaha (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 9, 14:19:23
        
        Ad hominem. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 14:25:13
        
        Pardon me (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 9, 14:59:16
        
        as a wise man once said (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 9, 13:56:52
    - Or should I say the Webber’s extending their clutches! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 13:19:10

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.