doesn't this new structure do the opposite re control?

Previously it was Stone & Webber calling the shots, now it's Webber and these two other bods, so in theory he has less clout if the other two don't agree with him?

I always find it interesting when a senior leaves and his (or her) work are absorbed by colleagues. Makes me wonder just how important/busy that senior bod was if they don't need to be replaced.

Posted By: CWC on October 9th 2018 at 14:11:29

Message Thread

Statement (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 13:12:45
- 'as a rum'n intut. (n/m) (NCFC) - Dunney, Oct 9, 13:51:55
- Hmm. That’s hardly going to stop speculation about what’s gone on (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 13:16:35
- So stone out Webber in? (n/m) (NCFC) - Pukki Pies, Oct 9, 13:15:33
- And another (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 9, 13:15:27
  - This I’m not so keen on. Webber extending his clutches. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 13:18:22
    - Jim, you're all over this like a horse in a nosebag. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 13:29:54
      - Hehe (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Oct 9, 13:45:30
      - I just think some of our problems towards the end under McNally were due to (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 13:37:41
        
        doesn't this new structure do the opposite re control? (NCFC) - CWC, Oct 9, 14:11:29
        
        Probably not when two of the three are husband and wife... (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 9, 14:24:46
        
        yes, so I see (NCFC) - CWC, Oct 9, 14:46:46
        
        NEVER!!! (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 9, 15:39:33
        
        indeed (NCFC) - CWC, Oct 9, 16:57:39
        
        You do absolutely despise Webber though for some reason. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 13:44:08
        
        I’ve never said the others weren’t good signings and I don’t have an issue with (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 13:45:59
        
        Slippery. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 13:47:14
        
        Good to see Norway chasing jim as usual (NCFC) - Men without hats, Oct 9, 14:26:37
        
        He's trying, politely, to get him to justify his stance towards Webber. Perfectly (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Oct 9, 15:21:53
        
        I've justified it several times, he just doesn't accept my reasoning (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 15:26:40
        
        I just don't think you give him a fair crack of the whip Jim. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 16:10:18
        
        What is my position on him then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 17:18:15
        
        Based on your posts - you don't like him. That's it really. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 17:52:17
        
        Don't be tiresome. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 14:33:07
        
        Calling someone slippery often considered rude or insulting (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 9, 15:32:25
        
        Ok 👍 (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 15:37:27
        
        Webber seems to be doing a good job though no ?... (NCFC) - loz, Oct 9, 13:41:24
        
        Indeed, and McNally also did a good job at the time we needed him. Businesses change and (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Oct 9, 13:44:13
        
        Some people need the drama. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 13:45:58
        
        VMT. Into every life a little rain must fall... and if it's dry, well I can always drive.. (NCFC) - Pixelman, Oct 9, 14:38:22
        
        Hard to tell really isn’t it. Yes our first team recruitment seems to have been decent (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 13:43:50
        
        McNally never really got recruitment right, with a few shining exceptions it was mediocre (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Oct 9, 13:47:26
        
        At this level I think he did. Struggled when he tried to move to a higher calibre of (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 13:55:15
        
        Hang on though (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Oct 9, 13:58:10
        
        no idea, he seemed to be doing pretty much everything by the end (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 14:01:34
        
        Hmmmm. Show your working. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Oct 9, 14:03:21
        
        Well whether or not the academy has had any positive influence yet from (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Oct 9, 13:47:09
        
        Your criticism of Webber is always without caveats. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 13:45:11
        
        I don;t think that true. I haven;t got time to go through my old posts but (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 14:00:47
        
        You've not praised HIM for signings. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 14:13:31
        
        Not sure I did actually. I slated him for allowing us to go into the season with Husband (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 14:33:45
        
        You called his signing "a horrific failure from Webber" (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 14:42:35
        
        Not wishing to be picky but I wasn;t describing his signing there more the (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 14:45:26
        
        We can agree to disagree here. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 14:53:33
        
        funnily enough (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 9, 13:53:58
        
        It's not an unreasonable point re player sales. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 14:10:18
        
        hahaha (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 9, 14:19:23
        
        Ad hominem. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 9, 14:25:13
        
        Pardon me (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 9, 14:59:16
        
        as a wise man once said (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 9, 13:56:52
    - Or should I say the Webber’s extending their clutches! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 9, 13:19:10

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.