Because you are not looking at the same threshold for conviction.
You are assessing risk. You can say it is probable that he has undertaken other harmful behaviour which has not yet been addressed in terms of risk reduction. You are not reconvicting him.
Posted By: finkleton on March 28th 2018 at 15:58:12
Message Thread
- FAO Legal Wrathers - Interested in your views on the Worboys JR verdict (General Chat) - Jim, Mar 28, 15:17:50
- Hanging is too good for him (n/m) (General Chat) - Jumbo1, Mar 28, 19:50:52
- Because you are not looking at the same threshold for conviction. (General Chat) - finkleton, Mar 28, 15:58:12
- But surely you are effectively convicting him of all the (General Chat) - Jim, Mar 28, 18:22:38
- I can see what you mean but it's seen like this- (General Chat) - finkleton, Mar 28, 19:00:04
- I can see both sides of the argument but it’s appears that (General Chat) - Jim, Mar 28, 19:07:29
- Yes it should have been sorted at the time to avoid this. They probably thought (General Chat) - finkleton, Mar 28, 19:23:19
- I can see both sides of the argument but it’s appears that (General Chat) - Jim, Mar 28, 19:07:29
- I can see what you mean but it's seen like this- (General Chat) - finkleton, Mar 28, 19:00:04
- But surely you are effectively convicting him of all the (General Chat) - Jim, Mar 28, 18:22:38
- “judges "finding a way" to get the outcome they plainly thought was right” (General Chat) - Old Git, Mar 28, 15:51:55
- Using my legal expertise (General Chat) - SCC 28, Mar 28, 15:37:52
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.