Well the red waited for every before asking for a video review. That part shouls

Be sped up. If I’m doubt ask immediately. The video team should always start to review the obvious things which would be 90% about being offside or not after every goal and then they have a head start if the ref asks for a review.

Seemed there like he waited too long to ask and then they didn’t look at it until he requested the review.

Posted By: Steve in Holland on January 16th 2018 at 21:36:27

Message Thread

Not enjoying VAR in the Leicester game. (NCFC) - stanleh, Jan 16, 21:33:08
- I've said on many occasions in the past (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Jan 16, 22:04:32
- Not been watching but genuinely think it will ruin football (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 16, 21:54:12
  - For the top clubs possibly (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 16, 21:55:49
    - For fans (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 16, 22:07:00
- Jamie VARy (n/m) (NCFC) - bird table, Jan 16, 21:42:04
- It really is. So robotic. (n/m) (NCFC) - stanleh, Jan 16, 21:36:40
  - Virtually A Robot (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Jan 16, 21:44:27
- Well the red waited for every before asking for a video review. That part shouls (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 16, 21:36:27
  - *the red waited for ages*. This autocorrect is doing my head in. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 16, 21:36:58
    - I dunno just dont see the need for it. (NCFC) - stanleh, Jan 16, 21:39:41
      - Yep (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 16, 21:55:05
      - Used to love all the fuck ups we benefited from in the prem (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 16, 21:48:15
        
        you think if VAR was in then we'd actually have been granted any? (NCFC) - Tombs, Jan 16, 21:52:18
        
        Of course (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 16, 21:53:08
        
        I agree, fairer decisions will benefit 'smaller' clubs (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 16, 22:07:57
        
        ok, do you think we'd have been granted any that swung the decision our way? (NCFC) - Tombs, Jan 16, 21:56:41
        
        So what. Even if it was over turned which it wouldnt be. (NCFC) - stanleh, Jan 16, 22:01:53
        
        (Am not sure what is reviewable) (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 16, 21:58:46
        
        basically, the qualifying criteria are (NCFC) - Tombs, Jan 16, 22:22:18
        
        Camjam’s overhead kick? (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 16, 21:58:33
        
        why would the ref have changed his mind on viewing the video (NCFC) - Tombs, Jan 16, 22:00:58
    - REF for fucks sake. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 16, 21:37:11
- VAR is shit (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 16, 21:36:00

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.