yeah, that was always the risk
I think perhaps in the last 20 minutes we could have perhaps tried to risk a bit more. At that stage it was clear that Chelsea weren't at their best and just one goal would probably have been enough to put us through. Now we're back to square one. They can study our weaknesses and one goal probably won't be enough in the return leg.
Perhaps I'm wrong here, but I can't believe we are at the stage yet where the money from the replay is being prioritized over maximizing the chance of progressing in the cup.
Posted By: Mecagoenti on January 6th 2018 at 20:17:26
Message Thread
- Seriously folks, if you are going to moan about drawing with Chelsea then it’s probably (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, Jan 6, 19:34:22
- Absolutely (n/m) (NCFC) - camcan, Jan 6, 19:46:39
- ^^^100%^^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 6, 19:46:08
- Absolutely this. (NCFC) - norway, Jan 6, 19:44:26
- Thought police alert. Nee naw nee naw (n/m) (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 6, 20:02:36
- Blowhard gobshite alert. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Jan 6, 20:17:18
- Thought police alert. Nee naw nee naw (n/m) (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 6, 20:02:36
- On the other hand, if you don't have some slight disappointment that (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 6, 19:38:37
- How can you EVEN THINK this, let alone SAY it? You are clearly a "fucking weapon" (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 6, 20:00:16
- Absolutely,100% triggered to the tits. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Jan 6, 20:19:52
- Chelsea bought on a £60m striker to try and win, doesn;t sound like ateam lacking urgency (n/m) (NCFC) - Kar1, Jan 6, 19:44:01
- I think this was a game to defend and then try to score on the break (NCFC) - Kar1, Jan 6, 19:46:51
- yeah, that was always the risk (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 6, 20:17:26
- it might not sound like that, but it was pretty clear watching the game (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 6, 19:44:41
- perhaps they don't have the brilliantly talented squad we all think they have! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kar1, Jan 6, 19:50:52
- I think this was a game to defend and then try to score on the break (NCFC) - Kar1, Jan 6, 19:46:51
- Watched in USA. Commentators said first half was the (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 6, 19:41:54
- So they didn’t watch the Leicester game today then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 6, 19:54:11
- Don't know. Just stating what the Brit announcers said. (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 6, 19:56:22
- What do they know about Footie over there anyhow.... (n/m) (NCFC) - promethian1, Jan 6, 19:44:30
- Was British announcer and commentator. (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 6, 19:47:40
- So they didn’t watch the Leicester game today then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 6, 19:54:11
- How can you EVEN THINK this, let alone SAY it? You are clearly a "fucking weapon" (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 6, 20:00:16
- I saw 11/1 odds on a draw pre match and though I wouldn't mind putting on a tenner (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Jan 6, 19:35:17
- I saw that but when checking it was 4-1. I’d have made a rare bet at 11-1! (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 6, 19:36:19
- Was actually only 7-1 on us winning (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 6, 19:36:48
- I saw that but when checking it was 4-1. I’d have made a rare bet at 11-1! (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 6, 19:36:19
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.