Can't understand why don't give up their majority shareholding

And become minority shareholders. Would be the best solution and allow someone with deeper pockets support the club financially. It's the same model Burnley and Bournemouth have and opens up the board to more investment.

I think their problem is they don't want to give up their powerful position at the club.

Posted By: roedtonowhere on December 23rd 2017 at 14:16:20

Message Thread

Soon as we had an upturn in fortunes Delia and co had their loans repaid in full... (NCFC) - loz, Dec 23, 14:10:52
- They all had their loans repaid......if you remember.. (NCFC) - berstreetsfinest, Dec 23, 18:14:55
- funnily enough (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Dec 23, 14:26:31
  - I think that’s fair enough (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 23, 14:37:35
    - some of that I agree with (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Dec 23, 14:49:30
- ipswich have evans putting in 6m a year just to keep them afloat (n/m) (NCFC) - Liv, Dec 23, 14:19:13
- Can't understand why don't give up their majority shareholding (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Dec 23, 14:16:20
  - would you? (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Dec 23, 14:37:29
    - Walker did invest £97m that’s different league (n/m) (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, Dec 23, 14:50:21
    - Succession planning to somebody without any finances to support a club in modern football (n/m) (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Dec 23, 14:49:48
    - They were unlucky to get terrible new owners (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 23, 14:38:57
      - Im going to say it doesnt work more than it works (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 23, 15:33:32
      - So the question is (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Dec 23, 15:01:45

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.