Not unless he was a replacement for Jerome or Oliveira. As cover for them or

a different option to bring on he would have been very useful I think.

I'm not criticising the club for not signing him just saying I thought when watching that Shef U transfer window video that he was a useful signing for that money (and one that went a bit under the radar) and his two goals at Sunderland on Saturday re-enforced that view.

Posted By: Jim on September 11th 2017 at 13:48:29

Message Thread

Tell you who would have been a good signing,= Clayton Donaldson. (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Sep 11, 12:51:41
- Lol (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Sep 11, 13:15:45
  - Shut up, TC. (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Sep 11, 13:40:22
- Things are not that bad that we need to be looking at signing (NCFC) - maidstoneyellow, Sep 11, 13:07:27
  - Good option to have on bench imho (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Sep 11, 13:36:44
    - yes (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Sep 11, 13:37:47
      - I expect you'd rate Clayton of his surname was Donalfssson (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Sep 11, 13:39:52
  - save that for jannery when Nelson "Boom Boom" Oliveira gets windowed out (NCFC) - Tombs, Sep 11, 13:12:36
- Hindsight is a wonderful thing MICHAEL (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, Sep 11, 13:02:52
  - He's blocked me after the "D.H." unpleasantness (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Sep 11, 13:37:31
- Yes - thought that when I watched that Shef U video. £100K (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 11, 12:52:16
  - me too (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, Sep 11, 14:51:26
  - 100k for a 33 yr-old (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Sep 11, 13:10:11
    - Not unless he was a replacement for Jerome or Oliveira. As cover for them or (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 11, 13:48:29
    - Proven goalscorer for £100k, squad cover, should have been all over it (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Sep 11, 13:41:33

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.