Point of order

I'm arguing against the motion because the poster initiated the original post with a conjunction when there was nothing to conjunct. The post would have made sense without it therefore I'm ruling no. Not on grammatical rules, but purely on the fine pillar of brevity.

Posted By: Tombs on March 10th 2017 at 13:23:54

Message Thread

And I would like to say (General Chat) - camcan, Mar 10, 12:41:32
- Ralf might right you off now (General Chat) - Old Git, Mar 10, 13:57:03
- And i do too. (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 10, 13:28:02
- Has it ever been a rule? Only for heathens. (General Chat) - CWC, Mar 10, 13:11:19
  - Point of order (General Chat) - Tombs, Mar 10, 13:23:54
    - Was conjunctering from a lower thread (General Chat) - camcan, Mar 10, 14:04:05
      - I gettit now; DNCS (General Chat) - Tombs, Mar 10, 14:39:37
- And but so (n/m) (General Chat) - colincanary, Mar 10, 12:53:06
- Better than starting with "So". (General Chat) - APB, Mar 10, 12:52:23
  - And I agree with you on this (General Chat) - camcan, Mar 10, 14:02:12
  - So sage. (n/m) (General Chat) - Garry Brooke, Mar 10, 13:46:00
- innit (n/m) (General Chat) - Jumbo1, Mar 10, 12:41:57

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.