He had improved granted but

we still didn't need him when we bought him and he's still not as good as Wes or Pritchard in my view. When he plays well he's decent enough but when he doesn't he's awful.

Posted By: Jim on March 7th 2017 at 20:34:23

Message Thread

Prior to his injury Naismith had been one of our better performers in the previous four (NCFC) - Pixelman, Mar 7, 20:29:47
- I didn't think he was a great signing (yes, said so at the time) (NCFC) - Old Man, Mar 7, 20:36:40
- VMT (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Mar 7, 20:33:31
- agreed (NCFC) - earthleakage, Mar 7, 20:32:12
  - He had improved granted but (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 7, 20:34:23
    - His work without the ball is better than Pritchard. (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Mar 7, 20:39:43
      - vmt. he never stops running. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pixelman, Mar 7, 20:42:17
    - Good shout 👍 (NCFC) - Tombs, Mar 7, 20:36:54
    - he has struggled (NCFC) - earthleakage, Mar 7, 20:36:43
- People can't see past the transfer fee and ... (NCFC) - loz, Mar 7, 20:32:08
- Not his biggest fan but as you say he was starting to look good before his injury. (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Mar 7, 20:32:04

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.