Thought Hughton should have been sacked a few months earlier than he was
The actual time he did get the boot was, in my view, McNally type choice; brave but chancy and a real spin of the dice and I can understand why it was made.
McNally had made some excellent decisions earlier on in his time at City but I know he’d also made some lucky (or it could be viewed as well calculated) ones as well which he’d got away with. He lucked out on this one.
Posted By: KentonCanary on December 28th 2016 at 10:55:15
Message Thread
- Genuine question... (NCFC) - Mark Barham, Dec 28, 09:05:25
- Binary football (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, Dec 28, 15:58:12
- Not many fans enjoyed his defensive style of play (NCFC) - Hit Squadie, Dec 28, 11:01:33
- Funny at Brighton he is wholesome in his praise for the players. (n/m) (NCFC) - Mark Barham, Dec 28, 11:06:37
- Thought Hughton should have been sacked a few months earlier than he was (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Dec 28, 10:55:15
- We had nothing to lose in sacking him (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 28, 10:56:51
- He played 1 up front with wingers on their weaker foot (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Dec 28, 10:52:35
- Should have kept him and supported him with a recruitment plan. DM fucked both up (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Dec 28, 10:39:11
- Disagree (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Dec 28, 13:21:35
- No & Yes. We should have sack before the January window or once he relegated us. (n/m) (NCFC) - DickyVonStinkhorn, Dec 28, 10:34:41
- His recruitment was the start of the trend that sees us where we are today (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 28, 10:31:57
- I will enjoy them and will endeavour to not be a dick 😀 (n/m) (NCFC) - Mark Barham, Dec 28, 11:05:46
- You're allowed to be a dick (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 28, 11:19:46
- I will enjoy them and will endeavour to not be a dick 😀 (n/m) (NCFC) - Mark Barham, Dec 28, 11:05:46
- No he should have been sacked 6 months earlier (NCFC) - matgore, Dec 28, 10:00:30
- Fair enough, good assessment (n/m) (NCFC) - Mark Barham, Dec 28, 10:01:15
- It was a bad time (NCFC) - matgore, Dec 28, 10:28:50
- Fair enough, good assessment (n/m) (NCFC) - Mark Barham, Dec 28, 10:01:15
- He may have learnt from his time with us but the more key fact (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 28, 09:21:14
- Brighton have a good budget too, don't they? (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 28, 10:34:03
- Should never have got rid of him; he's a pragmatist (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 28, 09:28:16
- Same as any manager then (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 28, 11:07:27
- Should not have got rid of him when we did no. He would prob have (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 28, 09:48:03
- He signed those players and vs us... (NCFC) - loz, Dec 28, 09:32:25
- I would say he's very (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 28, 10:35:16
- *good at getting teams to play at their level (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 28, 10:36:28
- I would say he's very (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 28, 10:35:16
- that's about it, will be interesting if they go up. (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Dec 28, 09:24:05
- He is an excellent champ manager ... (NCFC) - loz, Dec 28, 09:17:16
- Managers like players, find their niche. (NCFC) - um_gah, Dec 28, 09:08:33
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.