Yes absolutely

The problem is, the benchmark set by the government (and others) is not what the law says, it's some moral judgment of what the "right" amount to pay is.

So long as the avoidance is not contrived and artificial I'm ok with it. Choosing one option of how to do something over another because it comes with a lower tax bill is an acceptable thing to do in my book (so long as both options are sensible and not artificial / contrived).

Posted By: SimonOTBC on September 27th 2016 at 08:01:32


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in