I don't disagree with that, but I think there's a case for bringing him back
Rudd isn't entirely blameless anyway, the defence has been disorganised and that's down to him partly isn't it?
Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage on February 2nd 2016 at 15:22:28
Message Thread
- team for tonight (NCFC) - yellows2011, Feb 2, 14:31:27
- I can't even decide what formation we'll use (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 2, 15:42:41
- total football formation (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 2, 15:45:24
- Rush goalie (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, Feb 2, 16:08:21
- total football formation (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 2, 15:45:24
- No Weslington? (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 2, 15:30:29
- hasn't been very good recently (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 2, 15:40:44
- Naismith is better than wes in behind the striker (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Feb 2, 17:58:01
- Superb pass to create McMessi's goal v Liverpool (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 2, 15:54:04
- yes, he was better against liverpool to be fair (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 2, 16:03:45
- I can't really remember if he has or not (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 2, 15:41:41
- Most of them have been useless lately (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 15:43:43
- oh yeah, liverpool (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 2, 15:44:47
- SAN out - booooooo (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Feb 2, 15:46:05
- not yet, after two more defeats (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 2, 15:50:09
- no chance - I'd drink a pint of my own piss if that happened (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Feb 2, 16:10:55
- not yet, after two more defeats (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 2, 15:50:09
- SAN out - booooooo (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Feb 2, 15:46:05
- oh yeah, liverpool (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 2, 15:44:47
- Most of them have been useless lately (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 15:43:43
- hasn't been very good recently (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 2, 15:40:44
- I would start with (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 2, 15:24:39
- 4 4 fucking 2 (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Feb 2, 15:30:35
- More like 4-3-1-2 really like this (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 2, 15:35:35
- 4 4 fucking 2 (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Feb 2, 15:30:35
- Why would we bring back Ruddy? (NCFC) - King, Feb 2, 14:54:59
- Because Rudd is to blame for our defenders not defending (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 15:34:16
- why not? (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 2, 15:05:35
- Ruddy has been a weak link though - bringing him back tonight with a new defence in (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Feb 2, 15:10:55
- I don't disagree with that, but I think there's a case for bringing him back (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 2, 15:22:28
- Ruddy has been a weak link though - bringing him back tonight with a new defence in (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Feb 2, 15:10:55
- Rudd, Wes, BamBam (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Feb 2, 14:53:17
- Bennett deserves a go (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 14:37:24
- hes still turd (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 2, 15:31:52
- We haven't conceded at home with him for hours (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 15:33:52
- In the league (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 16:01:50
- wevs (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 2, 15:42:50
- Him and Klose dream partnership (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 15:44:04
- We haven't conceded at home with him for hours (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 15:33:52
- hes still turd (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 2, 15:31:52
- dorrans? you think (n/m) (NCFC) - IG88, Feb 2, 14:35:39
- I certainly hope brady won't be LB (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 2, 14:35:33
- I agree and think Olsson is fine to go with (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 2, 14:44:31
- I can't even decide what formation we'll use (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 2, 15:42:41
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.