Wouldn't a renowned economist look at ?8m
For a player a) who the manager doesn't want b) who doesn't want to be here and c) which we paid less than half that amount for 18 months ago, and say thank you very much?
If we get relegated at Bournemouth's (and Grabban's) expense, then it's been a terrible business move. I think the management and board have taken a calculated gamble that there are many other factors in getting relegated than Lewis Grabban
Posted By: Duck on January 12th 2016 at 16:50:51
Message Thread
- Puzzled...again (NCFC) - pkdo75, Jan 12, 16:44:04
- Are we strengthening them ? It may be that when he plays he weakens them. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 12, 17:19:14
- i have no clue but i will say these points in no particular order (NCFC) - doncoop, Jan 12, 16:53:31
- Wouldn't a renowned economist look at ?8m (NCFC) - Duck, Jan 12, 16:50:51
- Doubt it.. (NCFC) - pkdo75, Jan 12, 17:17:36
- Presumably we've strengthened a rival but also to our own benefit, rather than (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 12, 17:20:35
- Vmt (n/m) (NCFC) - yellowman, Jan 12, 16:53:31
- Doubt it.. (NCFC) - pkdo75, Jan 12, 17:17:36
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.