You legend - i've made copious notes of your words.
I've literally just read a copy of the restrictive covenants I'm faced with and there is one which prohibits building an extension to property without original vendors approval. I need to extend this gaff, and I'm not entirely sure how to track descendants of this person down, and not too happy about having to go through the ?800 70 week restrictive covenant appeal process, so maybe insurance is a solution.
Basically, olden days land baron types were busy c**ts. Beaks in everything.
Posted By: MIKEWALKER on July 27th 2015 at 16:07:24
Message Thread
- FAO MIKEWALKER (General Chat) - CWC, Jul 27, 15:41:44
- I may be wrong, but doesn't the indemnity only work if you and your (General Chat) - Meh, Jul 27, 16:27:40
- Don't think so. (General Chat) - avenging canary, Jul 27, 16:41:32
- So you had to pay ?300 to waive the clause as you'd built a house/extension and not sought (General Chat) - MIKEWALKER, Jul 27, 16:46:41
- It was a house on the old Trowse training ground. (General Chat) - avenging canary, Jul 27, 16:50:34
- So you had to pay ?300 to waive the clause as you'd built a house/extension and not sought (General Chat) - MIKEWALKER, Jul 27, 16:46:41
- Don't think so. (General Chat) - avenging canary, Jul 27, 16:41:32
- Mrs Bungle says about the same thing (General Chat) - Bungle, Jul 27, 16:14:14
- You legend - i've made copious notes of your words. (General Chat) - MIKEWALKER, Jul 27, 16:07:24
- Had a similar issue a few years ago. (General Chat) - avenging canary, Jul 27, 15:46:55
- I may be wrong, but doesn't the indemnity only work if you and your (General Chat) - Meh, Jul 27, 16:27:40
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.