As with the discussions that have been had on here over the Ched Evans case

There is a clear distinction between whether someone may be guilty of a crime and whether there is sufficient evidence to safely convict someone of a crime.

This is a case where there is just not enough evidence to convict safely so the decision not to continue the proceedings is right. Whether or not he did it I have no idea. The one element of it that troubles me is the meetings with the taxi driver at the hotel after she had been car-jacked/killed and at (at least one of) which he admits to giving him the money, supposedly for a helicopter trip. That looks very suspicious to me and you wonder of seeing that simply convinced the police that he was guilty from the outset meaning that they did not perhaps subsequently investigate the matter as well/thoroughly as they should have done.

Posted By: Jim on December 8th 2014 at 12:51:04


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in