Exactly, If Fer was deployed in a more positive role last season, I still
believe he & us would have done much better, but there you go.
Posted By: lovely old job on August 19th 2014 at 10:18:09
Message Thread
- Fer undergoing medical at QPR (n/m) (NCFC) - Duck, Aug 19, 10:04:25
- good (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Aug 19, 10:41:54
- BTw surely its "rumoured" to be undergoing a medical (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 19, 10:11:46
- 7M is a bit cheap though (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Aug 19, 10:09:32
- Makes Adams' comments yesterday sound very odd (NCFC) - King, Aug 19, 10:08:48
- Not really, he gave a caveat. (NCFC) - lurd, Aug 19, 10:12:02
- he told it like it is. I really cannot see what else he could have said. Factually correct (NCFC) - Pixelman, Aug 19, 11:54:08
- Maybe by saying that and putting Fer in the squad etc (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Aug 19, 10:40:14
- To me it sounded like a pretty firm statement that he wasn't going anywhere (n/m) (NCFC) - King, Aug 19, 10:18:05
- It's not worth getting up the arse about. (n/m) (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Aug 19, 10:29:31
- Not to me it didn't - far far from it imo... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Aug 19, 10:22:51
- No it didn't! (NCFC) - Duck, Aug 19, 10:21:14
- 'To me' (NCFC) - King, Aug 19, 10:22:42
- Not a smokescreen (NCFC) - duke of york, Aug 19, 10:36:34
- I was merely pointing out that your subjective opinion (NCFC) - Duck, Aug 19, 10:28:13
- 'To me' (NCFC) - King, Aug 19, 10:22:42
- ?7m is not "decent whack" in today's market. I'm not that bothered about him leaving (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 19, 10:11:12
- We've more or less doubled our money on him (NCFC) - King, Aug 19, 10:21:18
- Thats not really relevant. if you look at comparables in the transfer market then (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 19, 10:24:50
- Who are the comparables in the market, then? (NCFC) - Yellalee, Aug 19, 10:29:01
- exactly this - lots of capable midfielders on the continent for less than ?7m (NCFC) - CWC, Aug 19, 10:58:26
- VMT (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 19, 10:43:41
- I wouldn't have let him go for less than ?10m, Its not as if he was (NCFC) - lovely old job, Aug 19, 10:26:13
- Wages though mate. (NCFC) - lurd, Aug 19, 10:33:30
- I thought all players had a relegation wage clause, I do understand that (NCFC) - lovely old job, Aug 19, 10:37:40
- Wages though mate. (NCFC) - lurd, Aug 19, 10:33:30
- Who are the comparables in the market, then? (NCFC) - Yellalee, Aug 19, 10:29:01
- Thats not really relevant. if you look at comparables in the transfer market then (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 19, 10:24:50
- yep it is Hughton and his little mentality that has really narked me more than (NCFC) - lovely old job, Aug 19, 10:14:12
- Players like Fer were supposed to be our "next level" players (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 19, 10:15:34
- VMT. the damage hughton did to us with his negativity is (NCFC) - fal5taff, Aug 19, 10:19:38
- And yet listening to the pre-season previews (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 19, 10:23:10
- Exactly, If Fer was deployed in a more positive role last season, I still (NCFC) - lovely old job, Aug 19, 10:18:09
- Will be interesting to see how he gets on. (NCFC) - lurd, Aug 19, 10:17:26
- Decent profit then given he didn't do much for us (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 19, 10:18:24
- VMT. the damage hughton did to us with his negativity is (NCFC) - fal5taff, Aug 19, 10:19:38
- Players like Fer were supposed to be our "next level" players (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 19, 10:15:34
- I also agree re Adams comments yesterday. It really does seem (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 19, 10:13:05
- We've more or less doubled our money on him (NCFC) - King, Aug 19, 10:21:18
- Not really, he gave a caveat. (NCFC) - lurd, Aug 19, 10:12:02
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.