is that relevant?

since it is now effectively zero. We only kept the bank from the door then by selling the likes of Bellamy and Eadie.

Plus in 2000 we had low crowds (needed 16,000 per week to break even if I recall, and pretty much only got that for local derbies and 'kids for a quid' nights) and a delapidated stand that badly needed replacing.

Pretty much everything about the club is in a better state (although the internet has tended to make the fanbase more vociferously grouchy)

Posted By: mr carra on May 19th 2014 at 11:33:24

Message Thread

All these lessons I've heard being learnt since 2000 (NCFC) - pants, May 19, 10:49:48
- the club is in a much better state than it was in 2000 (NCFC) - mr carra, May 19, 11:10:27
  - What was the debt in 2000? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 19, 11:17:19
    - is that relevant? (NCFC) - mr carra, May 19, 11:33:24
      - Ok, in 2000 I think the debt was 6m, and we financed a ?15m loan (which is considered (NCFC) - pants, May 19, 11:50:55
        
        Well. what all that shows is that since the new board has been in place (NCFC) - norway, May 19, 11:57:00
        
        I presented some details to what I think. You don't agree (NCFC) - pants, May 19, 12:14:05
        
        it's never going to be smooth (NCFC) - mr carra, May 19, 12:33:13
        
        I think the catchment area, and the loyalty of fans plays a massive part (NCFC) - pants, May 19, 12:45:18
        
        I did agree. (NCFC) - norway, May 19, 12:19:41
      - Also football is a sport (NCFC) - norway, May 19, 11:36:01
        
        this (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, May 19, 11:56:23

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.