Agree up to a point

Each appointment is a step in to the unknown and Hughton must not be sacked just because we aren't tearing up the league.

He should only go if relegation genuinely looms and his niceness plays no part in that.

I hope he succeeds, I am not certain about anything and like you I won't care a jot if he goes.

Posted By: norway on December 30th 2013 at 08:34:51

Message Thread

My head says "inner" (NCFC) - norway, Dec 30, 00:03:29
- Whatever happens, Hughton isn't a shit manager, he'll be turfed out for non footballing (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 00:24:47
  - I can't see him being sacked, unless we fall into the drop zone (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 30, 09:43:41
  - No he wont.....he will be sacked because of results. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 30, 01:28:43
  - What? (NCFC) - LeicesterYellow, Dec 30, 00:35:59
    - He gets the relevant results, did last season, will this (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 00:47:49
      - Don't buy that in the slightest. (NCFC) - LeicesterYellow, Dec 30, 15:30:42
      - So we beat Fulham Hull and Cardiff then oh and Villa too ? (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Dec 30, 08:25:46
      - Cleared that up then. (n/m) (NCFC) - tudders, Dec 30, 02:00:58
- Inner, but if they sacked.him tomorrow I would barely give a fuck. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Dec 30, 00:19:47
  - Agree up to a point (NCFC) - norway, Dec 30, 08:34:51
  - ban this sick filth! (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Dec 30, 03:51:06
  - This (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 00:26:04
  - Wow. There may be 23 hours 40 minutes and 13 seconds... (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 30, 00:25:43
    - I've never had a candidate that suited us if we made the silly decision, but Pepe Mel (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 00:26:56
      - When Lambert walked, my instant reaction was that we should go for Hughton (NCFC) - Klobo04, Dec 30, 00:57:18
        
        Agree, I want Hughton here the next 10 years (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 01:01:39
        
        Thats not going to happen is it......... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 30, 01:32:50
        
        The only names I could give would be Bielsa or Mel (NCFC) - Klobo04, Dec 30, 01:07:18
        
        Bielsa is too big for Norwich, high profile and known (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 01:12:58
        
        Pants, theoretical I know, but what kind of football would we (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 30, 01:20:03
        
        ha, Betis games are never dull, all out attack, freedom of expression (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 01:22:23
        
        Check out 2012/13 season (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 01:27:37
        
        Not exactly tight at the back are they? (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 30, 01:48:45
        
        I think that goes with the partisan nature of the club (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 02:07:39
        
        So we'd be a bit like Blackpool couple years back? (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 30, 02:15:19
        
        Well we could stick with Hoots and respect his formations (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 02:28:39
        
        Please refrain from posting rumours regarding anyone's private life (n/m) (NCFC) - Klobo04, Dec 30, 02:05:18
        
        Shameful! but I laughed (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 30, 02:13:58
        
        2 league wins? (n/m) (NCFC) - Klobo04, Dec 30, 01:30:27
        
        Sorry, ignore that, wrong season (n/m) (NCFC) - Klobo04, Dec 30, 01:32:42
        
        I'd have to find the post where I said not a tip as such, but if you can get odds on Betis (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 01:34:33
        
        It's here, I said I was really concerned for them (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 01:43:26
        
        Would he succeed with our squad or need heavy investment? (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 30, 01:24:31
        
        Yeah, he'd be fine with our team, has had high profile players (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 01:28:42

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.