Whatever happens, Hughton isn't a s**t manager, he'll be turfed out for non footballing

reasons

Which makes supporting Norwich even more irrational than ever

Posted By: pants on December 30th 2013 at 00:24:47

Message Thread

My head says "inner" (NCFC) - norway, Dec 30, 00:03:29
- Whatever happens, Hughton isn't a shit manager, he'll be turfed out for non footballing (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 00:24:47
  - I can't see him being sacked, unless we fall into the drop zone (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 30, 09:43:41
  - No he wont.....he will be sacked because of results. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 30, 01:28:43
  - What? (NCFC) - LeicesterYellow, Dec 30, 00:35:59
    - He gets the relevant results, did last season, will this (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 00:47:49
      - Don't buy that in the slightest. (NCFC) - LeicesterYellow, Dec 30, 15:30:42
      - So we beat Fulham Hull and Cardiff then oh and Villa too ? (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Dec 30, 08:25:46
      - Cleared that up then. (n/m) (NCFC) - tudders, Dec 30, 02:00:58
- Inner, but if they sacked.him tomorrow I would barely give a fuck. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Dec 30, 00:19:47
  - Agree up to a point (NCFC) - norway, Dec 30, 08:34:51
  - ban this sick filth! (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Dec 30, 03:51:06
  - This (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 00:26:04
  - Wow. There may be 23 hours 40 minutes and 13 seconds... (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 30, 00:25:43
    - I've never had a candidate that suited us if we made the silly decision, but Pepe Mel (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 00:26:56
      - When Lambert walked, my instant reaction was that we should go for Hughton (NCFC) - Klobo04, Dec 30, 00:57:18
        
        Agree, I want Hughton here the next 10 years (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 01:01:39
        
        Thats not going to happen is it......... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 30, 01:32:50
        
        The only names I could give would be Bielsa or Mel (NCFC) - Klobo04, Dec 30, 01:07:18
        
        Bielsa is too big for Norwich, high profile and known (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 01:12:58
        
        Pants, theoretical I know, but what kind of football would we (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 30, 01:20:03
        
        ha, Betis games are never dull, all out attack, freedom of expression (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 01:22:23
        
        Check out 2012/13 season (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 01:27:37
        
        Not exactly tight at the back are they? (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 30, 01:48:45
        
        I think that goes with the partisan nature of the club (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 02:07:39
        
        So we'd be a bit like Blackpool couple years back? (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 30, 02:15:19
        
        Well we could stick with Hoots and respect his formations (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 02:28:39
        
        Please refrain from posting rumours regarding anyone's private life (n/m) (NCFC) - Klobo04, Dec 30, 02:05:18
        
        Shameful! but I laughed (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 30, 02:13:58
        
        2 league wins? (n/m) (NCFC) - Klobo04, Dec 30, 01:30:27
        
        Sorry, ignore that, wrong season (n/m) (NCFC) - Klobo04, Dec 30, 01:32:42
        
        I'd have to find the post where I said not a tip as such, but if you can get odds on Betis (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 01:34:33
        
        It's here, I said I was really concerned for them (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 01:43:26
        
        Would he succeed with our squad or need heavy investment? (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 30, 01:24:31
        
        Yeah, he'd be fine with our team, has had high profile players (NCFC) - pants, Dec 30, 01:28:42

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.