he's only there to give the fans a figure to blame and keep the precious players protected
Posted By: Ralf Scrampton on December 28th 2013 at 23:46:26
Message Thread
- There is so much lame, one-eyed, ignorant, vindictive shit on here about today. (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Dec 28, 22:56:14
- POTD (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, Dec 29, 08:22:09
- What total nonsense. (NCFC) - LeicesterYellow, Dec 29, 00:57:57
- Ah yes, because changing the formation and subs never works... (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:26:07
- No need to change the formation today (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 28, 23:50:58
- It was a much improved performance (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 28, 23:25:45
- And now we go to Palace... another supposed Hoodoo ground. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:26:55
- "pseudo-technical garbage about formation or tactics" (NCFC) - norway, Dec 28, 23:09:52
- yes, I did mean you. But not only you (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Dec 28, 23:22:02
- I thought we played very well today and deserved at least a point (NCFC) - norway, Dec 28, 23:31:04
- nah, it doesn't matter where people play... (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:32:48
- he's only there to give the fans a figure to blame and keep the precious players protected (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 28, 23:46:26
- I think the standard response is "He signed 'em" (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:50:03
- *have* (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 28, 23:52:41
- He has chosen to keep them. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:53:49
- A hanging offence, no? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 28, 23:57:42
- not at all, I have no idea why this is even being talked about (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 29, 00:01:15
- Lol, I forgot the internetwinkywankysmileyface. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 29, 00:04:42
- not at all, I have no idea why this is even being talked about (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 29, 00:01:15
- no, like any squad it is evolving, players have contracts, budgets are limited (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 28, 23:57:27
- Duh... we all know this. It's his squad, he is the manager. The responsibility is his. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 29, 00:02:04
- you think i was serious? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 29, 00:06:51
- Duh... we all know this. It's his squad, he is the manager. The responsibility is his. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 29, 00:02:04
- A hanging offence, no? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 28, 23:57:42
- He has chosen to keep them. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:53:49
- *have* (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 28, 23:52:41
- I think the standard response is "He signed 'em" (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:50:03
- he's only there to give the fans a figure to blame and keep the precious players protected (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 28, 23:46:26
- nah, it doesn't matter where people play... (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:32:48
- I thought we played very well today and deserved at least a point (NCFC) - norway, Dec 28, 23:31:04
- yes, I did mean you. But not only you (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Dec 28, 23:22:02
- Ivmawaot (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Dec 28, 23:06:42
- Much of that is true. However, (NCFC) - BillySteele, Dec 28, 23:06:02
- "Wolfy for Hoops was a like for like..." (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 28, 23:42:46
- Well, I'll make a suggestion (NCFC) - BillySteele, Dec 28, 23:53:06
- So replacing Hooper for RVW was a perfectly acceptable change in your eyes? (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 28, 23:57:06
- See my recent post below. (NCFC) - BillySteele, Dec 29, 00:00:43
- OK. Peace. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 29, 00:05:33
- Peace. And hope we win at Palace. (n/m) (NCFC) - BillySteele, Dec 29, 00:07:14
- OK. Peace. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 29, 00:05:33
- See my recent post below. (NCFC) - BillySteele, Dec 29, 00:00:43
- So replacing Hooper for RVW was a perfectly acceptable change in your eyes? (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 28, 23:57:06
- The point he is making is quite clear (NCFC) - norway, Dec 28, 23:46:45
- The point I'm making is also quite clear. (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 28, 23:51:54
- In response to that.. (NCFC) - BillySteele, Dec 28, 23:58:31
- You have to ignore the Hooper substitution (NCFC) - norway, Dec 28, 23:58:04
- Oh very much so, but why use then use the RVW/Hooper example? (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 28, 23:59:40
- You're clutching at straws now. (n/m) (NCFC) - BillySteele, Dec 29, 00:02:54
- Oh very much so, but why use then use the RVW/Hooper example? (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 28, 23:59:40
- double sub I suppose, but can't complain at taking off an injured Hooper (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:53:01
- The point I'm making is also quite clear. (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 28, 23:51:54
- Well, I'll make a suggestion (NCFC) - BillySteele, Dec 28, 23:53:06
- That's another thing - "depleted ManU side". What about our team, minus Tettey, Howson, (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Dec 28, 23:20:46
- Perhaps you could just calm down? (NCFC) - norway, Dec 28, 23:36:11
- Yes. It made me cross hearing some fans automatically booing the Hooper sub (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Dec 28, 23:22:34
- Hooper was injured anyway (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:24:13
- Precisely. But I would bet that you hadn't spotted that before you saw him go down the (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Dec 28, 23:35:44
- vmt (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, Dec 29, 08:24:27
- ? I didn't boo or complain about the sub (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:42:53
- Precisely. But I would bet that you hadn't spotted that before you saw him go down the (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Dec 28, 23:35:44
- Hooper was injured anyway (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:24:13
- "Wolfy for Hoops was a like for like..." (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 28, 23:42:46
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.