It was a much improved performance

And no points

It's so frustrating that they gave that performance against the team they were v unlikely to beat and the s**t performance against s**tty useless Fulham

Posted By: Old Git on December 28th 2013 at 23:25:45

Message Thread

There is so much lame, one-eyed, ignorant, vindictive shit on here about today. (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Dec 28, 22:56:14
- POTD (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, Dec 29, 08:22:09
- What total nonsense. (NCFC) - LeicesterYellow, Dec 29, 00:57:57
  - Potd (n/m) (NCFC) - Lager top, Dec 29, 07:02:05
- Ah yes, because changing the formation and subs never works... (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:26:07
  - No need to change the formation today (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 28, 23:50:58
- It was a much improved performance (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 28, 23:25:45
  - And now we go to Palace... another supposed Hoodoo ground. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:26:55
- "pseudo-technical garbage about formation or tactics" (NCFC) - norway, Dec 28, 23:09:52
  - yes, I did mean you. But not only you (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Dec 28, 23:22:02
    - I thought we played very well today and deserved at least a point (NCFC) - norway, Dec 28, 23:31:04
      - nah, it doesn't matter where people play... (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:32:48
        
        he's only there to give the fans a figure to blame and keep the precious players protected (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 28, 23:46:26
        
        I think the standard response is "He signed 'em" (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:50:03
        
        *have* (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 28, 23:52:41
        
        He has chosen to keep them. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:53:49
        
        A hanging offence, no? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 28, 23:57:42
        
        not at all, I have no idea why this is even being talked about (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 29, 00:01:15
        
        Lol, I forgot the internetwinkywankysmileyface. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 29, 00:04:42
        
        me too ;) (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 29, 00:07:31
        
        no, like any squad it is evolving, players have contracts, budgets are limited (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 28, 23:57:27
        
        Duh... we all know this. It's his squad, he is the manager. The responsibility is his. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 29, 00:02:04
        
        you think i was serious? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 29, 00:06:51
- Ivmawaot (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Dec 28, 23:06:42
- Much of that is true. However, (NCFC) - BillySteele, Dec 28, 23:06:02
  - "Wolfy for Hoops was a like for like..." (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 28, 23:42:46
    - Well, I'll make a suggestion (NCFC) - BillySteele, Dec 28, 23:53:06
      - So replacing Hooper for RVW was a perfectly acceptable change in your eyes? (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 28, 23:57:06
        
        See my recent post below. (NCFC) - BillySteele, Dec 29, 00:00:43
        
        OK. Peace. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 29, 00:05:33
        
        Peace. And hope we win at Palace. (n/m) (NCFC) - BillySteele, Dec 29, 00:07:14
    - The point he is making is quite clear (NCFC) - norway, Dec 28, 23:46:45
      - The point I'm making is also quite clear. (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 28, 23:51:54
        
        In response to that.. (NCFC) - BillySteele, Dec 28, 23:58:31
        
        You have to ignore the Hooper substitution (NCFC) - norway, Dec 28, 23:58:04
        
        Oh very much so, but why use then use the RVW/Hooper example? (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 28, 23:59:40
        
        You're clutching at straws now. (n/m) (NCFC) - BillySteele, Dec 29, 00:02:54
        
        double sub I suppose, but can't complain at taking off an injured Hooper (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:53:01
        
        Indeed. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Dec 28, 23:58:22
  - That's another thing - "depleted ManU side". What about our team, minus Tettey, Howson, (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Dec 28, 23:20:46
    - Perhaps you could just calm down? (NCFC) - norway, Dec 28, 23:36:11
    - Yes. It made me cross hearing some fans automatically booing the Hooper sub (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Dec 28, 23:22:34
      - Hooper was injured anyway (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:24:13
        
        Precisely. But I would bet that you hadn't spotted that before you saw him go down the (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Dec 28, 23:35:44
        
        vmt (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, Dec 29, 08:24:27
        
        ? I didn't boo or complain about the sub (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 28, 23:42:53

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.