It's certainly not a big deal

But I don't agree with you that the ref should have falsely applied a law. His job was to apply the law. It would then have been our job to apply the spirit.

Posted By: Old Git on October 26th 2013 at 17:51:13

Message Thread

The Fer goal (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 26, 17:37:20
- He had every power to disallow it (NCFC) - norway, Oct 26, 17:46:35
  - It's certainly not a big deal (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 26, 17:51:13
    - Fair enough - but I just don't CARE that he did that. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 26, 17:54:04
      - Why do you assume that we wouldn't have allowed them to equalise? (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 26, 17:59:57
        
        I don't - may well have happened (NCFC) - norway, Oct 26, 18:06:03
        
        hughton never even saw it (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 26, 18:03:12
    - ^^^^ this. Legal training to the fore OG. Totally agree with you. (n/m) (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Oct 26, 17:53:11
  - vmt (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 26, 17:48:56
- Absolutely (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 26, 17:45:08
- Why no power to rule out the goal? Balls cross the line 2 yards and (NCFC) - XXL16, Oct 26, 17:43:46
- maybe the ref hadn't indicated play could restart (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 26, 17:42:04
  - It did seem like everyone was happy that the game had restarted (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 26, 17:45:42
    - I know - the ref clearly would have let it continue if MArshall collected the ball (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 26, 17:48:27
- my thoughts exactly. would have been interesting to see if we allowes them to walk one ... (NCFC) - avid_canary, Oct 26, 17:39:44
- vmt (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Oct 26, 17:37:52

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.