The Fer goal

It was a goal under the laws of the game

The ref had no power to disallow it and should not have bent the law to do so

The game should have restarted and in the spirit of the game City should have allowed Cardiff to score

The end, that is the answer, no room for argument

Posted By: Old Git on October 26th 2013 at 17:37:20

Message Thread

The Fer goal (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 26, 17:37:20
- He had every power to disallow it (NCFC) - norway, Oct 26, 17:46:35
  - It's certainly not a big deal (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 26, 17:51:13
    - Fair enough - but I just don't CARE that he did that. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 26, 17:54:04
      - Why do you assume that we wouldn't have allowed them to equalise? (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 26, 17:59:57
        
        I don't - may well have happened (NCFC) - norway, Oct 26, 18:06:03
        
        hughton never even saw it (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 26, 18:03:12
    - ^^^^ this. Legal training to the fore OG. Totally agree with you. (n/m) (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Oct 26, 17:53:11
  - vmt (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 26, 17:48:56
- Absolutely (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 26, 17:45:08
- Why no power to rule out the goal? Balls cross the line 2 yards and (NCFC) - XXL16, Oct 26, 17:43:46
- maybe the ref hadn't indicated play could restart (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 26, 17:42:04
  - It did seem like everyone was happy that the game had restarted (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 26, 17:45:42
    - I know - the ref clearly would have let it continue if MArshall collected the ball (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 26, 17:48:27
- my thoughts exactly. would have been interesting to see if we allowes them to walk one ... (NCFC) - avid_canary, Oct 26, 17:39:44
- vmt (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Oct 26, 17:37:52

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.