I agree, you can't sack a manager for going to Stoke and Wigan and losing

and not having a shot, but when combined with the fact we've won 23 points in 26 games to just say "yeah but it's alright, we finished 11th, really bugs me.

5 games is way to soon and he should be given longer, but I just don't understand how people (not saying you) can't be concerned at our run of results.

Posted By: mrleelee on September 24th 2013 at 09:47:00

Message Thread

Hughton piece by poster off of on here... (NCFC) - loz, Sep 24, 08:29:45
- Pretty much agree with all of that (n/m) (NCFC) - trianglepatch, Sep 24, 14:56:45
- Pretty much agree with all of it......clearly some fans have lost the plot. (NCFC) - usacanary, Sep 24, 14:38:15
- I blame the 'FIFA/Championship Manager' Generation (NCFC) - Mozzer, Sep 24, 11:00:37
- It's a load of drivel. (NCFC) - BillySteele, Sep 24, 10:04:53
  - nope..... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 24, 10:36:53
    - and could very well end up back down there if we keep sacking managers (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Sep 24, 10:41:29
      - vmt... (NCFC) - Pixelman, Sep 24, 10:58:06
    - Ding. 2 points for Chelts. (n/m) (NCFC) - BigGrantHolt, Sep 24, 10:40:00
      - I don't see the relevance of that (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 24, 10:41:39
        
        I think that some fans have let their expectations get away from them (NCFC) - Maillot Jaune, Sep 24, 10:47:45
        
        Certainly an element of that (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 24, 10:49:43
        
        the relevance is this...... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 24, 10:55:37
        
        Still not remotely relevant to discussing the way we play (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 24, 10:57:48
        
        I agree with this... but most premier league managers are automatons (NCFC) - Maillot Jaune, Sep 24, 11:13:45
      - Well you would say that wouldn't you? (n/m) (NCFC) - BillySteele, Sep 24, 10:41:23
    - I was there for the postponed game (NCFC) - BillySteele, Sep 24, 10:39:58
      - no, the point is...... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 24, 10:57:28
        
        Yes but (NCFC) - BillySteele, Sep 24, 11:59:05
        
        this is McNally (and the board's) responsibility, not ours (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Sep 24, 12:02:43
        
        yes, McNally is you personal IT section.... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 24, 15:17:22
        
        But if your PC started to malfunction you'd still be really fucked off (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 24, 11:00:25
      - LOL. Top analogy. (n/m) (NCFC) - bird table, Sep 24, 10:48:17
- I liked it tbh (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Sep 24, 10:04:23
- I completely agree with that.... (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Sep 24, 09:22:57
  - only cos you'd have to change your username again if he goes (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Sep 24, 09:40:40
- Who is it off of on here? (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Sep 24, 09:04:18
  - Big grant holt I think? (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Sep 24, 09:09:12
    - Strange, I disagree with almost all of it! (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Sep 24, 09:11:39
      - Walsall away and Jason Jarrett is irrelevant now (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 24, 09:23:19
        
        Exactly (NCFC) - norway, Sep 24, 09:27:19
        
        "His job is to maintain anmd improve on it" (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Sep 24, 10:17:33
        
        Indeed (NCFC) - norway, Sep 24, 10:49:12
        
        Which I think he's doing (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Sep 24, 10:38:31
        
        But "10 game run, last 26 games, wins against WBA/Man City etc, they ALL count" (NCFC) - um_gah, Sep 24, 10:46:00
        
        *now not know (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Sep 24, 10:39:01
    - Yes that's definitely him (n/m) (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Sep 24, 09:11:32
- But the very poor performances are outweighing the poor ones... (NCFC) - um_gah, Sep 24, 08:43:33
  - Absolutely disagree "All the gear but no idea" shall we conveniently (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Sep 24, 09:10:14
    - 11th position was so false, it should be done under the Trades Description Act! (n/m) (NCFC) - um_gah, Sep 24, 09:42:16
      - I thought the table didn't lie...but tell you what it does for Hughton, but not Lambert? (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Sep 24, 09:44:44
    - So why were you so convinced we were down last season? (NCFC) - mrleelee, Sep 24, 09:30:04
      - You can do that with every argument...do Wigan fans forget the freakish result (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Sep 24, 09:38:23
        
        Meanwhile, we lost to Luton (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 24, 09:39:10
      - Cos I'm a pessimistic football fan and he proved (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Sep 24, 09:34:20
        
        So you weren't pessimistic because of 2 wins in 17 in 2013? (NCFC) - mrleelee, Sep 24, 09:38:36
        
        Yes I was...but you can't sack a manager because we were shit against (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Sep 24, 09:43:04
        
        I agree, you can't sack a manager for going to Stoke and Wigan and losing (NCFC) - mrleelee, Sep 24, 09:47:00
        
        This is also correct (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 24, 09:50:36
        
        This is correct (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 24, 09:44:17
    - 2 games away from taking us down as well (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Sep 24, 09:12:22
      - And Man Utd were 2 minutes away from losing the Champions League final in 1999. (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Sep 24, 09:19:29
  - "Those matter. They are in the history books" (NCFC) - mrleelee, Sep 24, 09:01:09
- "No matter what he does, I feel Chris Hughton will never win with some sections" (NCFC) - Waddockhunt, Sep 24, 08:39:57
- I'm not a Hughton outer or inner just yet (NCFC) - mrleelee, Sep 24, 08:35:25
- What a load of twaddle! The only reason we are here is Lambert not Hughton! (n/m) (NCFC) - Thegelman, Sep 24, 08:32:40

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.