We shouldnt get rid of 'Hughton'.

There are only a couple of scenarios where we should:

If this current form continues into next season (that or relegation) after he has spent good money.

Or if somebody clearly superior becomes available.

We don't want to do what Wolves did.

Posted By: Common Sense Police on April 22nd 2013 at 13:22:49

Message Thread

For those that want rid of Houghton (Other Football) - bullsch, Apr 22, 13:18:57
- Don't think there are that many that seriously want him out? (Other Football) - norway, Apr 22, 13:44:04
- His signings have been top drawer (n/m) (Other Football) - phrankin, Apr 22, 13:32:45
- I'm not sure he is quite as negative as he's portrayed (Other Football) - mr carra, Apr 22, 13:28:07
  - I've said pretty much exactly that before now. (Other Football) - mr chimp, Apr 22, 13:41:51
    - I disagree... Form has little to do with it. (Other Football) - phrankin, Apr 22, 14:30:35
      - FEWER (n/m) (Other Football) - Arizona Bay, Apr 22, 14:46:20
    - Or not playing to their strengths (n/m) (Other Football) - Common Sense Police, Apr 22, 13:59:36
  - In game I think he is very negative/cautious. (Other Football) - phrankin, Apr 22, 13:33:46
  - Our attacking players have struggled because they were suited to free flowing attacking (Other Football) - Common Sense Police, Apr 22, 13:33:44
- We shouldnt get rid of 'Hughton'. (Other Football) - Common Sense Police, Apr 22, 13:22:49
- Hughton or Hootun - Not Houghton. (n/m) (Other Football) - Dog, Apr 22, 13:19:22

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.