I'd say we look weaker without - Wrath of the Barclay

I'd say we look weaker without

Tettey and Johnson. Howson, fox et al haven't ever looked like seriously challenging for a starting berth.

Posted By: Cardiff Canary on April 21st 2013 at 10:06:50

Message Thread

vital players for us (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Apr 21, 09:50:04
- I'm a heretic (NCFC) - Old Man, Apr 21, 10:19:33
  - "he won't always start" (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Apr 21, 11:17:27
- Desperately need to find a midfielder capable of playing in a two alonside (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 10:07:53
  - I'd like to see fox given a go there (NCFC) - Old Man, Apr 21, 10:12:16
    - I'd have agreed at the start of the season (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Apr 21, 11:13:06
      - To be fair to Fox his lack of game time means he's been really rusty (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 13:07:46
  - Should sat Tettey not regret! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 10:08:29
    - Say even! Doh! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 10:08:46
- Not sure about that (NCFC) - norway, Apr 21, 09:54:27
  - I'd say we look weaker without (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Apr 21, 10:06:50
    - Agree about Tettey and Johnson and would expect them to stay (NCFC) - norway, Apr 21, 10:11:04
      - Johnson's passing is nowhere near the required level. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 21, 10:39:41
- Substitute Holt for Wessi and you might have a point... (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Apr 21, 09:52:03
  - wondered about Wes (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Apr 21, 10:03:36
- ... (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Apr 21, 09:51:03

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.