I aren't getting into this debate for long but

I always thought Hamilton didn't get any money, or the players he wanted. So in the end you got the 6 freebies who were like you say "awful"

But think of it in a different way, without money, what would we have got?

We'd have got Holt cos he was Hamiltons buy

?100,000

We'd have got Clint Easton cos he was ?100,000

They'd have been no Rivers for ?650,000
No Emblen for ?500,000
No Drury for ?500,000

Without the cash injection, would we have seen the same side that got promoted?

I really don't think so

I have made this point ooodles of times on here even when worthy was a very popular manager here

He has lived off boardroom support and when things have gone bad for him, a bit of money has boosted the side and morale

Something managers before worthington did get, and in the end they bore the brunt of the fans and got the sack

I don't say Hamilton was a great manager, but I certainly don't see worthington as one either

Posted By: pants on November 8th 2005 at 20:45:46

Message Thread

I'm trying hard to remember how I felt during the Hamilton days.. (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Nov 8, 20:34:39
- we probably have a couple of better players ......... (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Nov 8, 20:47:24
- I felt a lot more hatred towards Hamilton back then (NCFC) - Poirot, Nov 8, 20:39:50
  - I aren't getting into this debate for long but (NCFC) - pants, Nov 8, 20:45:46
    - well putting it like that you have a point (NCFC) - Poirot, Nov 8, 20:54:45
      - I was at that Barnsley game when we playing against 10 men (NCFC) - pants, Nov 8, 21:13:05
        
        Probably the best argued case for Worthington to go I've seen (NCFC) - Poirot, Nov 8, 21:36:50

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.