We have missed Francis most of all this season

Noone to push the midfield forward, support the attack, draw defenders away from Hucks.

At the AGM, in one breath he says he is happy with the current midfield. In the next breath he says he didn't replace Francis because there wasn't enough time because he left so late in january - so did you think we needed to replace Francis then? or not? Which is it? And does that mean he will be looking for a Francis replacement in January (pray to god he won't be here!)? And if he really wanted to replace Francis, why was he trying to spend the whole budget on another striker?

Posted By: ede on November 6th 2005 at 01:13:23

Message Thread

If he thought they were spinless, why was he just sat on the bench doing nothing? (NCFC) - ede, Nov 6, 00:37:12
- he's run out of ideas (NCFC) - Poirot, Nov 6, 00:42:05
  - I agree with him for once - they were spineless (NCFC) - ede, Nov 6, 00:57:59
    - He signed nearly all the squad....... (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Nov 6, 12:43:08
    - but don't forget the players have a responsibility to motivate themselves (NCFC) - Poirot, Nov 6, 01:07:08
      - If you cant motivate yourself while earning ?200k+ then you should be sacked (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Nov 6, 12:44:14
    - we were spineless because he has removed our spine (NCFC) - Dave in France, Nov 6, 01:04:04
      - We have missed Francis most of all this season (NCFC) - ede, Nov 6, 01:13:23
        
        We missed Francis most of last season too (NCFC) - Bob_of_the_Barclay, Nov 6, 02:30:36
- oops - spineless (the club certainly isn't spinless though) (n/m) (NCFC) - ede, Nov 6, 00:38:00

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.