TBH...
The whole thing is one of those 1 in 1000000 type events where the rules don't cover it up. The sort of event which would have 2 high court judges squabbling back and forth with each other. It comes down to what is meant by the word 'intent'. Does intent mean Garrido planned to kick it back to Bunn or does intent mean he does kick it back to Bunn in a way that Bunn can deal with it without putting us at a disadvantage, in which case the back pass doesn't count because Garrido f**ked it up and Bunn had to give away a corner. You could go back and forth with it to be honest. In my eyes the ref did the right thing and rightly sided with the defending team, which is what I think should be done in that situation...
Posted By: POA on December 29th 2012 at 23:42:36
Message Thread
- so if that's called as a backpass (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 29, 22:55:36
- Spurs did it v Burnley at Turf Moor couple of years ago (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Dec 29, 23:23:48
- dunno, free kick to them? (NCFC) - Tombs, Dec 29, 22:59:40
- It's not deemed a back pass. (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 29, 22:58:53
- but he tried to pass it back and did (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 29, 23:02:35
- I thought the rule was (NCFC) - Klobo04, Dec 29, 23:07:14
- I believe there has to be intent... (NCFC) - POA, Dec 29, 23:11:13
- i think intent only covers whether he tried to pass back or not (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 29, 23:12:59
- that's what i did think when it happened (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 29, 23:09:27
- You're trusting Wiki? OK. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 29, 23:11:38
- But, lets play this with your rules... (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 29, 23:15:30
- could you be more condescending please? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 29, 23:24:05
- I thought the level of condescendation was pretty funny tbh (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Dec 29, 23:36:19
- I wanted a higher level (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 29, 23:42:28
- I thought the level of condescendation was pretty funny tbh (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Dec 29, 23:36:19
- ffs they're not my rules! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 29, 23:22:04
- and obviously he didn't pick it up (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 29, 23:23:39
- Boro at Carrow Road when the rule first came in (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 29, 23:25:06
- lol exactly (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 29, 23:28:07
- Indirect free kick on the line of the 6 yard box (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Dec 29, 23:33:32
- *goal line (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Dec 29, 23:34:08
- Indirect free kick on the line of the 6 yard box (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Dec 29, 23:33:32
- lol exactly (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 29, 23:28:07
- Boro at Carrow Road when the rule first came in (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 29, 23:25:06
- and obviously he didn't pick it up (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 29, 23:23:39
- could you be more condescending please? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 29, 23:24:05
- But, lets play this with your rules... (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 29, 23:15:30
- are we talking about the lobbed ball from Garrido? (NCFC) - conker, Dec 29, 23:11:21
- ref clearly interpreted it as not a back pass (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 29, 23:25:34
- Same here (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Dec 29, 23:37:42
- ref clearly interpreted it as not a back pass (NCFC) - Charles21, Dec 29, 23:25:34
- You're trusting Wiki? OK. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Dec 29, 23:11:38
- I believe there has to be intent... (NCFC) - POA, Dec 29, 23:11:13
- I thought the rule was (NCFC) - Klobo04, Dec 29, 23:07:14
- but he tried to pass it back and did (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 29, 23:02:35
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.