yes....
the initial verdict was correct to the letter of the law AND military Rules of Engagement that Lee (and us all) had signed upto.
What seemed unfair were the local environment/circumstances the lads were working under and had become use to, ie, plenty of IRA shootings, bombings.... And so it was argued that Lee made the best decision he could at the time as he thought the car driving through the check point was an imminent danger to life. Which is wasnt. Eventually the mitigating circumstances worked in his favour. The initial conviction probaly saved another half dozen lives, as suddenly local scallies were weary of TWOCing and driving through armed checkpoints, AND soldiers manning checkpoints would then be more careful if deciding to open fire.
Posted By: Cheltenham_Canary on September 5th 2012 at 11:26:12
Message Thread
- So, how many times have you left your debit card in the chip and pin machine at self (General Chat) - pants, Sep 5, 10:35:30
- Never (n/m) (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Sep 5, 11:29:52
- Never (n/m) (General Chat) - Old Man, Sep 5, 11:10:02
- Never (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Sep 5, 10:56:52
- Never (n/m) (General Chat) - Brom, Sep 5, 10:50:43
- Never, 'only idiots do that' ! Though I did lose four hundred quid out of my pocket in Fet (n/m) (General Chat) - Men without hats, Sep 5, 10:39:14
- Have you tried using one of these? (General Chat) - Klobo04, Sep 5, 10:46:38
- I've rushed to cash point, put in my card.... (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 5, 10:42:05
- twice in three days... chap in front walked away without his (General Chat) - Pixelman, Sep 5, 12:33:37
- I went after someone who left their card in the machine, and all they could do (General Chat) - pants, Sep 5, 10:47:01
- ungrateful cunts. (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 5, 10:49:08
- Are you a copper? (General Chat) - pants, Sep 5, 10:57:22
- no. (n/m) (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 5, 10:58:51
- They seem to be able to make decisions like that, to then be suspended for a bit (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Sep 5, 10:59:36
- yep... (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 5, 11:03:16
- Which clears em innit (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Sep 5, 11:05:50
- depends....... (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 5, 11:11:07
- conviction overturned thank goodness (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 5, 11:13:30
- no... (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 5, 11:17:27
- so a quashed conviction is the law doing well (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 5, 11:22:01
- yes.... (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 5, 11:26:12
- ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 5, 11:53:51
- ? (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 5, 12:00:12
- ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 5, 11:53:51
- yes.... (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 5, 11:26:12
- so a quashed conviction is the law doing well (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 5, 11:22:01
- no... (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 5, 11:17:27
- conviction overturned thank goodness (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 5, 11:13:30
- So like Omar says in the wire, it's the same game, the just holds a brief case (General Chat) - pants, Sep 5, 11:06:51
- *lawyer just holds a briefcase* (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Sep 5, 11:07:08
- depends....... (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 5, 11:11:07
- Which clears em innit (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Sep 5, 11:05:50
- yep... (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 5, 11:03:16
- They seem to be able to make decisions like that, to then be suspended for a bit (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Sep 5, 10:59:36
- no. (n/m) (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 5, 10:58:51
- Are you a copper? (General Chat) - pants, Sep 5, 10:57:22
- ungrateful cunts. (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 5, 10:49:08
- Fetford once ! (n/m) (General Chat) - Men without hats, Sep 5, 10:39:38
- What happened? (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Sep 5, 10:40:02
- Dunno, reckon I lost it in the car park. (General Chat) - Men without hats, Sep 5, 10:44:34
- Is that some sort of euphemism? (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Sep 5, 10:45:48
- Yes, with 'sexual connotations' ! (n/m) (General Chat) - Men without hats, Sep 5, 11:07:51
- Is that some sort of euphemism? (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Sep 5, 10:45:48
- Dunno, reckon I lost it in the car park. (General Chat) - Men without hats, Sep 5, 10:44:34
- What happened? (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Sep 5, 10:40:02
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.