"persuading the board not to invoke the relegation salary reduction clause" - what ARE you
ON??
20 May 2005
City chief's pledge to Worthington
Norwich City chief executive Neil Doncaster today made manager Nigel Worthington one simple pledge: Everything you earn is yours to spend.
Stressing from the outset that City have absolutely no financial need to offload any of their players following last Sunday's relegation from the Premiership, Doncaster gave a cast-iron guarantee that any money raised through player sales or releases would be ploughed straight back into Worthington's promotion kitty.
?One hundred per cent,? said Doncaster simply.
?And it's worth reiterating that we are under no pressure to sell anyone,? said Doncaster, as years of careful financial planning bears fruit ? in particular the club's insistence on a tiered wage structure that takes account of the likely ?13 million shortfall in income between the Premier League and the Championship that accompanies relegation.
Suddenly, each and every player on the club's books finds himself back on Championship wages ? still very good Championship-standard wages, but not potentially crippling Premiership-style packages.
?For a number of years now we've structured our finances so that we could not only survive but, hopefully, thrive back in the Championship if we did have the misfortune to be relegated from the Premiership,? said City's chief executive, all too well aware of what has befallen others on their way down ? a scenario that could yet find Southampton having to sell players simply to cover their debts. How much Saints boss Harry Redknapp sees of, say, a Peter Crouch transfer fee will do much to determine the strength of Southampton's promotion challenge next year.
?In the past, other clubs have either banked on being in the Premiership and not going down or, if they do, they then rely on selling players,? explained Doncaster, a policy that is fraught with peril with potential buyers either unwilling or unable to pay the long-term, Premiership-style wages enjoyed by, say, a Finidi George or a Pablo Counago ? whose non-tiered contracts helped propel Ipswich Town into administration following their relegation to the Championship in 2002.
?We are not relying on having to sell any of our players,? said Doncaster.
There are, of course, two potential flies in the ointment for Worthington over the summer ? both of which make Doncaster's ?100 per cent? commitment so crucial.
On the one hand, despite in theory being on a long-term contract at Carrow Road, in practice a player himself could seek a move back to the Premiership. On the other hand, someone could yet make an offer that is simply too good to be true ? a silly money move that both manager and board might believe is just too good to ignore.
For example, AGF Aarhus were today reported to be lining up a move for Thomas Helveg. Should Helveg opt for a return to his native Denmark, any transfer fee and the substantial saving in terms of Helveg's salary next season would be ploughed straight back into Worthington's kitty.
?The players who have already left or have been released, their contracts were up this summer anyway so there's no saving to be had there in next year's playing budget,? said Doncaster, after the recent departures of Graham Stuart, Marc Edworthy, Danny Crow and Phil Mulryne. And while the future of on-loan Arsenal star David Bentley has yet to be decided, in budget terms at least he does not figure in Worthington's current 2005-2006 spending plans.
?But everyone else is under contract for next year and budgeted for. So if anybody does decide to leave, then there will be that additional headroom for Nigel to work with,? said Doncaster, with the club already understood to have made a certain amount of money available for rebuilding ? irrespective of any player exits.
?Any transfer fees received, any savings that might be made in wages goes straight back into Nigel's budget ? 100 per cent. And lets be quite categoric about this ? any money raised through transfers this summer goes straight back into Nigel's pot.?
Such certainty is helped enormously by City's hugely-loyal fan base. The fact that the Canaries have effectively hit their 20,200 season-ticket ceiling already for next season is clearly a huge boost to all concerned.
?Cash is king in this business,? said a hugely grateful Doncaster. ?And the wave of support that we've seen at Carrow Road over recent years not only gives this club the fabulous vocal and passionate backing that we saw at Fulham last Sunday, but also gives us a stable cash flow that we can rely on.?
Posted By: Old Git on October 19th 2011 at 16:53:31
Message Thread
- for me the reason rodent took stick for loans (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Oct 19, 15:33:11
- Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaah! (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bayby, Oct 19, 15:47:31
- "Worthy signed a few in his time" (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Oct 19, 15:43:36
- i thought healy was ok (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Oct 19, 15:45:59
- meh. Roeder also signed some decent loans which you've ignored too. (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Oct 19, 15:48:46
- Worthy loaned in 21 players during his tenure (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 19, 15:58:33
- Andy Roberts? Whooooooooooooooooooooooooooo? (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Oct 19, 16:55:18
- You don't remember Andy Roberts? (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:58:10
- bloke from wimbledon? (n/m) (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Oct 19, 16:57:05
- I can't believe the total waste of money there, good god, next you'll be telling us (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:06:23
- Worthy's permanent transfer dealings (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 19, 16:09:58
- wow great manager (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Oct 19, 16:11:25
- He did well till we got relegated (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 19, 16:16:01
- The only thing that stops me actually hating Robert Earnshaw (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:17:23
- ^^^ crank (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:15:27
- He did well till we got relegated (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 19, 16:16:01
- wow great manager (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Oct 19, 16:11:25
- Worthy's permanent transfer dealings (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 19, 16:09:58
- Ooof. Some real shockers in there. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Oct 19, 16:04:42
- wtf! (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Oct 19, 16:02:32
- Andy Roberts? Whooooooooooooooooooooooooooo? (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Oct 19, 16:55:18
- Worthy loaned in 21 players during his tenure (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 19, 15:58:33
- meh. Roeder also signed some decent loans which you've ignored too. (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Oct 19, 15:48:46
- i thought healy was ok (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Oct 19, 15:45:59
- ............ (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 19, 15:43:15
- lol brilliant (n/m) (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Oct 19, 15:46:35
- You've implied that Roeder relegated us, and you know that's not true (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 15:37:45
- which manager do you think bears most responsibility for relegating us pants? (n/m) (NCFC) - jampersands, Oct 19, 15:40:50
- Worthington, Grant, Roeder and Gunn (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 15:44:41
- in that order? so worthington is most to blame? (NCFC) - jampersands, Oct 19, 15:54:03
- No order, collectively they all contributed to where we ended up (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:00:23
- on that basis you could blame every single manager we've ever had! (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Oct 19, 16:30:45
- 20th when he took the caretaker gig (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Oct 19, 15:59:52
- No order, collectively they all contributed to where we ended up (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:00:23
- The thing is (NCFC) - norway, Oct 19, 15:52:20
- in that order? so worthington is most to blame? (NCFC) - jampersands, Oct 19, 15:54:03
- Worthington, Grant, Roeder and Gunn (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 15:44:41
- which manager do you think bears most responsibility for relegating us pants? (n/m) (NCFC) - jampersands, Oct 19, 15:40:50
- the money that Worthy will have spent on his loans would be a lot more though probably (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Oct 19, 15:35:57
- that may be the case (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Oct 19, 15:40:23
- Who did we sell to sign Barnett? Who did we sell to sign Rob Edwards on loan (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 15:50:06
- or the board doesn't have a bottomless pit of money (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Oct 19, 15:57:02
- Yes, Roeder thought he could get prem quality on the cheap by loaning (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 19, 16:24:11
- Has it not occured though, that the moment they employ somebody else (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 17:01:02
- We didn't spend much (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 19, 17:05:30
- we spent a fair bit for a club just coming up (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Oct 19, 17:10:56
- have we spent more than Swansea? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Oct 19, 17:15:44
- Hard to take him seriously today, because trolling phrases I've made (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 17:23:27
- yep and they wasted a load on graham (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 17:18:12
- sadly some people think the 90 million quid talked about (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 17:28:20
- You'll have to name those people really. Cos I didn't say that (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 17:42:24
- sadly some people think the 90 million quid talked about (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 17:28:20
- have we spent more than Swansea? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Oct 19, 17:15:44
- we spent a fair bit for a club just coming up (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Oct 19, 17:10:56
- We didn't spend much (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 19, 17:05:30
- "persuading the board not to invoke the relegation salary reduction clause" - what ARE you (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 19, 16:53:31
- Pretty certain it all came out with the accounts (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 19, 17:05:44
- Nope (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 19, 17:22:39
- So the relegation clause *was* invoked (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 19, 17:48:08
- Nope (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 19, 17:22:39
- Pretty certain it all came out with the accounts (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 19, 17:05:44
- It's our misfortune that since Prem promotion until Lambert was brought in (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 19, 16:28:58
- agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Oct 19, 16:25:15
- Has it not occured though, that the moment they employ somebody else (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 17:01:02
- That isn't really an to what I wrote (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:03:24
- it's fuck all to do with Lambert and all to do with you claiming Roeder was never backed b (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Oct 19, 16:13:12
- I didn't say he was never given money by the board (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:29:43
- Oh, I think he was backed as much as the others (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 19, 16:34:12
- I think this is where this will always be an infinite stalemate then (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:54:11
- No, the others didn't have a lot; but Roeder did relatively speaking (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 19, 17:11:38
- Well for me, I've seen us have massive squads over the last couple of years (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 17:17:10
- I never said Lambert wasn't/isn't backed!? (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 19, 17:53:11
- I'm agreeing to disagree with you really. Because I remember transfers that became (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 18:10:38
- I never said Lambert wasn't/isn't backed!? (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 19, 17:53:11
- gunn had no chance (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Oct 19, 17:13:27
- roeder on the other hand had every chance (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 19, 17:29:46
- So in turn, you have sympathy for Roeder then, cos who'd join a club (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 17:26:23
- Well for me, I've seen us have massive squads over the last couple of years (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 17:17:10
- No, the others didn't have a lot; but Roeder did relatively speaking (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 19, 17:11:38
- I think this is where this will always be an infinite stalemate then (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:54:11
- Oh, I think he was backed as much as the others (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 19, 16:34:12
- he also claims the board didn't back lambert in the summer (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Oct 19, 16:16:09
- fair to say the board has backed lambo (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Oct 19, 16:51:57
- You called Lambert a c**t (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:50:03
- I didn't say he was never given money by the board (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:29:43
- *it's not been like this before Lambert* (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 16:03:42
- it's fuck all to do with Lambert and all to do with you claiming Roeder was never backed b (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Oct 19, 16:13:12
- Yes, Roeder thought he could get prem quality on the cheap by loaning (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 19, 16:24:11
- or the board doesn't have a bottomless pit of money (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Oct 19, 15:57:02
- Who did we sell to sign Barnett? Who did we sell to sign Rob Edwards on loan (NCFC) - pants, Oct 19, 15:50:06
- that may be the case (NCFC) - 1 5CC, Oct 19, 15:40:23
- Nbttt (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 19, 15:35:19
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.