85 and 93

were two years that book-ended one continued period in my view.

Of course there were rubbish periods. We were relegated in 85, did little in 88 and 91 and nearly went down in 92. But we achieved more in those eight years than in the rest of the club's history put together!

Posted By: norway on March 9th 2011 at 13:14:37

Message Thread

The NCFC 'best times' since I've followed them have been in three broad sections (NCFC) - norway, Mar 9, 12:43:45
- I think there's an age factor in that too. (NCFC) - Hugh Manatee, Mar 9, 13:17:40
  - They''re all way younger than me these days ! (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Mar 9, 13:57:28
- Agree with that...definately something special going on which is difficult to explain (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Mar 9, 13:00:38
- all the players seem decent blokes too (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 12:53:22
  - When we played Wimbledon at Plough Lane (NCFC) - Claygate_Canary, Mar 9, 13:47:28
- 85-93 was not all excellence (NCFC) - jayson blair, Mar 9, 12:50:48
  - 85 and 93 (NCFC) - norway, Mar 9, 13:14:37
    - Personally? (NCFC) - jayson blair, Mar 9, 13:24:23
      - But we finished 14th in 88 - so we recovered quite well (NCFC) - norway, Mar 9, 13:39:46
        
        but can't bring ourselves to say so ....! (n/m) (NCFC) - jayson blair, Mar 9, 13:46:19
  - must add, IMO (n/m) (NCFC) - jayson blair, Mar 9, 12:55:23

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.