when we look back over the season it won't matter how we played

as long as we get enough points to get us promoted.

if we have to get better players in to do this then we should do this.

if we can extend lansbury's loan again after it ends in january then we should do this, if we can't, then we should do something else. or do nothing.

if grant holt carries on scoring a two goals every game then we will be in with a good shout of promotion providing we can keep clean sheets in every game.

in the morning the sun will come up, if it doesn't, then there's something wrong.

Posted By: Tombs on December 18th 2010 at 18:07:27

Message Thread

had holt not scored that late winner (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 18, 18:00:09
- Coventry played well for a team with 10 men. (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 18, 18:06:36
  - yep chuffed with a draw (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 18, 18:07:09
- that would've been bad (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 18, 18:02:51
  - when we look back over the season it won't matter how we played (NCFC) - Tombs, Dec 18, 18:07:27
    - wrong username? (NCFC) - Brandonio, Dec 18, 18:25:53
      - arf! (NCFC) - Tombs, Dec 18, 18:28:12
  - one (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 18, 18:03:29
    - one would've been a last minute equaliser I think (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 18, 18:05:51
      - no cos holt didn't score (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 18, 18:06:53
        
        surely inventing an alternate reality to avoid admitting an error is going a little far (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 18, 18:11:51
        
        you seem confused (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 18, 18:15:27

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.