no cos holt didn't score
lambert out
Posted By: SCC 28 on December 18th 2010 at 18:06:53
Message Thread
- had holt not scored that late winner (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 18, 18:00:09
- Coventry played well for a team with 10 men. (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 18, 18:06:36
- yep chuffed with a draw (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 18, 18:07:09
- that would've been bad (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 18, 18:02:51
- when we look back over the season it won't matter how we played (NCFC) - Tombs, Dec 18, 18:07:27
- wrong username? (NCFC) - Brandonio, Dec 18, 18:25:53
- one (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 18, 18:03:29
- one would've been a last minute equaliser I think (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 18, 18:05:51
- no cos holt didn't score (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 18, 18:06:53
- surely inventing an alternate reality to avoid admitting an error is going a little far (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 18, 18:11:51
- you seem confused (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 18, 18:15:27
- surely inventing an alternate reality to avoid admitting an error is going a little far (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 18, 18:11:51
- no cos holt didn't score (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 18, 18:06:53
- one would've been a last minute equaliser I think (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 18, 18:05:51
- when we look back over the season it won't matter how we played (NCFC) - Tombs, Dec 18, 18:07:27
- Coventry played well for a team with 10 men. (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 18, 18:06:36
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.