What? There was no dissent. Nani thought he was fouled, so grabbed the ball for the pen.

Gomes picked it up. The ball was in play.

The handball was seen, but as Gomes had the ball THERE WAS NO NEED TO STOP THE PLAY.

Everything else is irrelevant.

I ask you again. Had Gomes punted the ball out for a throw, thereby losing his advantage, would you retrospectively give the freekick? This is what you are advocating.

There. Was. No. Cheating.
There. Was. No. Dissent.
There. Was. No. Bias.
There. Was. Naivety. From. Gomes.

Posted By: Arganth on November 1st 2010 at 00:15:37

Message Thread

Just seen the Nani controversy (General Chat) - King, Oct 31, 23:28:12
- Sorry, I disagree. (General Chat) - Arganth, Oct 31, 23:53:09
  - In the whole play to the whistle line that everyones so keen to cling to (General Chat) - pants, Oct 31, 23:57:09
    - You missed the first line of my post. (General Chat) - Arganth, Nov 1, 00:02:25
      - If the advantage was Gomes's, then Nani is committing a second (General Chat) - pants, Nov 1, 00:10:28
        
        What? There was no dissent. Nani thought he was fouled, so grabbed the ball for the pen. (General Chat) - Arganth, Nov 1, 00:15:37
        
        "Nani thought he was fouled, so grabbed the ball for the pen." (General Chat) - pants, Nov 1, 00:17:52
        
        He shouldn't have done that. I think that should be dissent. (General Chat) - APB, Nov 1, 00:24:52
        
        I think that's my biggest problem with this (General Chat) - pants, Nov 1, 00:28:24
      - Also, I don't buy this 'Just because it's Man Utd' bollocks. (n/m) (General Chat) - Arganth, Nov 1, 00:03:30
- They do it because they're all on the same gravy train as the media (General Chat) - pants, Oct 31, 23:36:02

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.