don't be a silly boy!
he's played as a striker this season and it didn't work.
Should we go 4 3 3 again as Kangol suggested?
Posted By: linda on September 11th 2005 at 10:38:29
Message Thread
- sorry to say but I think we played better as a team without Hucks (NCFC) - linda, Sep 11, 09:52:12
- Agreed - how about Hux as a sub to bring on with 25 mins to go (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Sep 11, 19:45:25
- team has better balance (NCFC) - ede, Sep 11, 11:14:19
- eaxactly. if we play well and win at watford, he's not going to start against scum (n/m) (NCFC) - PaulMcVeighGirl, Sep 11, 10:45:04
- would play hucks everytime he available.can win a match on his own! (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Sep 11, 10:24:28
- This problem has already been solved... (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Sep 11, 10:14:17
- He should partner Ashton when he returns (NCFC) - Kings Lynn Canary, Sep 11, 09:58:08
- Huckerby doesn't stay in the middle when he players as a striker... (NCFC) - Brom, Sep 11, 10:33:49
- and only one striker - no good (n/m) (NCFC) - ede, Sep 11, 11:06:01
- Huckerby doesn't stay in the middle when he players as a striker... (NCFC) - Brom, Sep 11, 10:33:49
- hurrah at last (NCFC) - Tomblander, Sep 11, 09:53:24
- don't be a silly boy! (NCFC) - linda, Sep 11, 10:38:29
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.