sorry to say but I think we played better as a team without Hucks

Brennan supports the defence more and doesn't drift out of the game. Hucks often tries to take the ball past one player too many.
However, we didn't have the same excitement as when Hucks gets the ball.
I can understand why there have been problems at other teams. Where do you fit him into the team?

Posted By: linda on September 11th 2005 at 09:52:12

Message Thread

sorry to say but I think we played better as a team without Hucks (NCFC) - linda, Sep 11, 09:52:12
- Agreed - how about Hux as a sub to bring on with 25 mins to go (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Sep 11, 19:45:25
- team has better balance (NCFC) - ede, Sep 11, 11:14:19
- eaxactly. if we play well and win at watford, he's not going to start against scum (n/m) (NCFC) - PaulMcVeighGirl, Sep 11, 10:45:04
- would play hucks everytime he available.can win a match on his own! (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Sep 11, 10:24:28
- This problem has already been solved... (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Sep 11, 10:14:17
- He should partner Ashton when he returns (NCFC) - Kings Lynn Canary, Sep 11, 09:58:08
  - Huckerby doesn't stay in the middle when he players as a striker... (NCFC) - Brom, Sep 11, 10:33:49
    - and only one striker - no good (n/m) (NCFC) - ede, Sep 11, 11:06:01
- hurrah at last (NCFC) - Tomblander, Sep 11, 09:53:24
  - don't be a silly boy! (NCFC) - linda, Sep 11, 10:38:29

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.