He should partner Ashton when he returns

His pace and ability would work well as a striker he can then go wide and get the ball into ashton as opposed to Ashton keep going wide and not being in the middle.
McVeigh played well but he is not a patch on Huckerby.
Ashton also looked more comfortable playing with McVeigh than he does with McKenzie.
One thing I will add is that our offsides were seriously reduced without Hucks and Leon on!

Posted By: Kings Lynn Canary on September 11th 2005 at 09:58:08

Message Thread

sorry to say but I think we played better as a team without Hucks (NCFC) - linda, Sep 11, 09:52:12
- Agreed - how about Hux as a sub to bring on with 25 mins to go (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Sep 11, 19:45:25
- team has better balance (NCFC) - ede, Sep 11, 11:14:19
- eaxactly. if we play well and win at watford, he's not going to start against scum (n/m) (NCFC) - PaulMcVeighGirl, Sep 11, 10:45:04
- would play hucks everytime he available.can win a match on his own! (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Sep 11, 10:24:28
- This problem has already been solved... (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Sep 11, 10:14:17
- He should partner Ashton when he returns (NCFC) - Kings Lynn Canary, Sep 11, 09:58:08
  - Huckerby doesn't stay in the middle when he players as a striker... (NCFC) - Brom, Sep 11, 10:33:49
    - and only one striker - no good (n/m) (NCFC) - ede, Sep 11, 11:06:01
- hurrah at last (NCFC) - Tomblander, Sep 11, 09:53:24
  - don't be a silly boy! (NCFC) - linda, Sep 11, 10:38:29

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.