I'm sort of confusing myself really

but what I'm trying to siphon in my brain is the idea that a player is sold for a value that is not just equivalent to a contract value - eg what we paid for Crofts to Brighton probably isn't the equivalent of his contract value, but contract plus perceived value. Whereas I'm not sure that this is quite the same here, as the original argument was about approach and agreed compensation, not about how well Norwich would do cf Colchester.

I'm almost certainly wrong - it just seems a bit odd if there were something so concrete in terms of future success as I can't think that would have formed an initiial discussion.

Posted By: camcan on June 1st 2010 at 11:34:35


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in