i assume the club have some level of insurance which covers this cost,

therefore other than a possible excess there is no additional cost incurred by the club?

sounds like lambert did a fergie and the ref was too weak to handle it, bigger picture though is that i expect it will benefit us in the long term to the detriment of charlton and colchester

Posted By: lmc on December 28th 2009 at 19:54:56

Message Thread

My thoughts plus the big picture (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 28, 19:33:36
- do you by any chance vocally express yourself anything like Julius Nicholson? (NCFC) - Brandonio, Dec 28, 21:58:57
  - Thank you Rocky Dennis.......... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 28, 22:53:38
- the stuff about Lambert is irrelevant (NCFC) - ede, Dec 28, 19:45:42
  - the ref gave the all clear at 1130 (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 20:19:21
  - the game was only in doubt when lambert complained (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 20:09:58
  - Agree 100% (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 28, 19:52:28
    - Stupid thing is (NCFC) - ede, Dec 28, 20:00:31
- Spot on. To be fair club are refunding coach costs - an uneeded expense to the club (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Dec 28, 19:39:09
  - club can't really do any more so fair play to them (NCFC) - ede, Dec 28, 19:48:11
    - I think fans very fortunate to get coach money back! (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Dec 28, 19:51:03
      - totally agree (NCFC) - ede, Dec 28, 19:55:30
        
        the fa? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 20:12:04
        
        because the ref got it wrong (NCFC) - ede, Dec 28, 21:48:16
        
        got what wrong? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 22:10:10
        
        I've just seen below (NCFC) - ede, Dec 28, 22:22:55
        
        you have no answer (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 22:33:36
      - i assume the club have some level of insurance which covers this cost, (NCFC) - lmc, Dec 28, 19:54:56
        
        Yeah, if ever you wanted a game this season to be called off, today was prob it (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Dec 28, 19:56:57
        
        tricky to call it off at 11am (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 20:27:16
        
        true, but i think in all honesty the pitch probably was playable and it was down to lambo (NCFC) - lmc, Dec 28, 19:59:43
        
        agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 20:12:29
        
        Refs decision - not Lamberts. If it was deemed safe by ref woulda gone ahead (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Dec 28, 20:06:15
        
        it was deemed safe by the ref (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 20:13:21
        
        Refs fault then. Shouldn't have been swayed. His responsibilty / decision. (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Dec 28, 20:21:09
        
        alas the world doesn't work like that (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 20:25:51
        
        All the more reason to have/make decent money............. (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 28, 22:55:15
        
        Ref at fault for not being strong enough. Ref at fault. (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Dec 28, 20:29:13
        
        lambert at fault for not respecting the ref's decision? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 20:30:22
        
        FAO SWC (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 28, 20:32:11
        
        OK - ta. No more feeding (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Dec 28, 20:34:19
        
        at least you acknowledge i'm right (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 20:36:44
        
        is it not a reasonable question? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 20:33:36
  - Agreed, nice gesture but what about those making there own way there. (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 28, 19:46:54
    - I was one of those that made my own way there! Personally unless the train cost was (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Dec 28, 19:49:59

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.