There was a situation yesty where England appealed against a decison (I think it was caugh

t) simply because they had a review left and were hoping that the ball was actually a missed no ball !

thats just silly.

and when the South Africans reviewed a decision based on TV replays seen in the pavillion, well that is unsporting in my book.

Posted By: shoddy on December 19th 2009 at 12:20:25

Message Thread

So the ICC is basically saying it doesn't believe that Hawk eye is accurate (Other Sports) - duke of york, Dec 19, 12:12:01
- but there is a fundamental difference (Other Sports) - jayson blair, Dec 19, 16:05:14
- I think that the whole review system is a big mess (n/m) (Other Sports) - shoddy, Dec 19, 12:16:06
  - It doesn't work. As far as Cricket goes, I'm all for just having the umpires. (n/m) (Other Sports) - DrDublin, Dec 19, 12:17:40
    - They seem to have changed the rules of cricket (Other Sports) - duke of york, Dec 19, 12:21:02
    - There was a situation yesty where England appealed against a decison (I think it was caugh (Other Sports) - shoddy, Dec 19, 12:20:25
      - Which sort of flies in the face of the traditions of Cricket. Fair play is integral. (n/m) (Other Sports) - DrDublin, Dec 19, 12:23:01

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.