was he? thought we paid summat for him

Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage on April 30th 2009 at 23:20:07

Message Thread

worthys trans in (in thousands)...good value or not? (NCFC) - conkers, Apr 30, 22:34:42
- a debate which is highly wasted on here for a number of reasons (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:18:51
  - so its perfect for wotb! (n/m) (NCFC) - conkers, Apr 30, 23:31:26
- why, is he coming back or suffen? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Apr 30, 22:43:03
  - i know is not that relevant (NCFC) - conkers, Apr 30, 22:46:22
- Hamilton signed Cottee and Walsh, didn't he? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Apr 30, 22:37:24
  - And also Notman, Nedergaard and McGovern (NCFC) - 6th May 1939, Apr 30, 23:53:03
  - good point. (NCFC) - conkers, Apr 30, 22:45:18
    - Getting rid of Jackson wasn't a disaster when we had Fleming and Mackay. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Apr 30, 22:49:54
      - ahh, I'll interject slightly here. Watching suctch at left back, whilst jackson was sounde (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:20:31
        
        I tell you what too, that game, I watched Flem lose his marker, and (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:31:55
        
        If that's just one game to some people and I'm being harsh (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:37:33
        
        Jesus christ, that is some memory. (NCFC) - lurd, Apr 30, 23:39:59
        
        I really am struggling to see the point of those posts (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 30, 23:47:44
        
        the point is, this was on the half way line (NCFC) - pants, May 1, 00:14:19
        
        that's got nowt to do with Worthy has it? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, May 1, 11:27:45
        
        If Sutch hadn't have come on we might have got to the Premiership under Worthy. (NCFC) - lurd, Apr 30, 23:54:40
        
        and if Matt Jackson wasn't sold we might have had one of the most solid defences in recent (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 30, 23:57:16
        
        It's a devils advocate amongst the worth never put a foot wrong brigade (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:44:30
        
        "the worth never put a foot wrong brigade" (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Apr 30, 23:48:49
        
        nah, not including you in owt, just bored of the recent (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:56:59
        
        are you suggesting if Croft was in contract he'd go for less than 700k? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 30, 23:58:20
        
        Well, what's your evaluation of the lad, a few years on? (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:59:36
        
        I'm not really sure to be honest (NCFC) - Charles21, May 1, 00:02:22
        
        If Croft was under contract I reckon he'd be worth about ?1.5m or so. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, May 1, 00:01:02
        
        To what team? (NCFC) - pants, May 1, 00:07:33
        
        don't think he's worth of either above (NCFC) - pants, May 1, 00:08:21
        
        Robinson wasn't too bad (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 30, 23:50:44
        
        like fotheringham (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 1, 00:12:29
        
        You spelt Bobbinson wrong (n/m) (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, May 1, 00:09:27
        
        Not really a devils advocate though is it? Picking holes in games of no consequence at all (NCFC) - lurd, Apr 30, 23:47:31
    - He may have saved us (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 30, 22:47:28
      - er Jason Jarret anyone? (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 30, 23:06:38
        
        but he was a free (NCFC) - conkers, Apr 30, 23:15:37
        
        was he? thought we paid summat for him (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 30, 23:20:07
        
        Even costing nothing, though, he was a total rip-off. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Apr 30, 23:18:16
        
        well 10 other clubs have made that mistake! (n/m) (NCFC) - conkers, Apr 30, 23:32:51
- oh and dublin and croft 600 (n/m) (NCFC) - conkers, Apr 30, 22:36:21

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.