worthys trans in (in thousands)...good value or not?
dareen ward 250 emblen 500
helveg free rivers 500
Johnson 750 brigs 65
Ashton 3m colin 260
charlton 250 Brennan free
dockerty 600 cottee free
safri 500 francis 250
zemma 300 hux 750
drury 500 mackenzie 350
holt 100 svensson 50
mcgovern 50
steeno free
walsh 50
robinson 50
notman 250
criton 150
easton 100
etuhu 450
most made money for the club, some unlucky with injury (zema, emblem) wastes of money were at least cheap (walsh, cottee)
do i have autism...im off to spot trains
Posted By: conkers on April 30th 2009 at 22:34:42
Message Thread
- worthys trans in (in thousands)...good value or not? (NCFC) - conkers, Apr 30, 22:34:42
- a debate which is highly wasted on here for a number of reasons (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:18:51
- so its perfect for wotb! (n/m) (NCFC) - conkers, Apr 30, 23:31:26
- why, is he coming back or suffen? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Apr 30, 22:43:03
- i know is not that relevant (NCFC) - conkers, Apr 30, 22:46:22
- Hamilton signed Cottee and Walsh, didn't he? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Apr 30, 22:37:24
- And also Notman, Nedergaard and McGovern (NCFC) - 6th May 1939, Apr 30, 23:53:03
- good point. (NCFC) - conkers, Apr 30, 22:45:18
- Getting rid of Jackson wasn't a disaster when we had Fleming and Mackay. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Apr 30, 22:49:54
- ahh, I'll interject slightly here. Watching suctch at left back, whilst jackson was sounde (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:20:31
- I tell you what too, that game, I watched Flem lose his marker, and (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:31:55
- If that's just one game to some people and I'm being harsh (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:37:33
- Jesus christ, that is some memory. (NCFC) - lurd, Apr 30, 23:39:59
- I really am struggling to see the point of those posts (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 30, 23:47:44
- the point is, this was on the half way line (NCFC) - pants, May 1, 00:14:19
- that's got nowt to do with Worthy has it? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, May 1, 11:27:45
- If Sutch hadn't have come on we might have got to the Premiership under Worthy. (NCFC) - lurd, Apr 30, 23:54:40
- and if Matt Jackson wasn't sold we might have had one of the most solid defences in recent (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 30, 23:57:16
- the point is, this was on the half way line (NCFC) - pants, May 1, 00:14:19
- It's a devils advocate amongst the worth never put a foot wrong brigade (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:44:30
- "the worth never put a foot wrong brigade" (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Apr 30, 23:48:49
- nah, not including you in owt, just bored of the recent (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:56:59
- are you suggesting if Croft was in contract he'd go for less than 700k? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 30, 23:58:20
- Well, what's your evaluation of the lad, a few years on? (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:59:36
- I'm not really sure to be honest (NCFC) - Charles21, May 1, 00:02:22
- If Croft was under contract I reckon he'd be worth about ?1.5m or so. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, May 1, 00:01:02
- To what team? (NCFC) - pants, May 1, 00:07:33
- don't think he's worth of either above (NCFC) - pants, May 1, 00:08:21
- To what team? (NCFC) - pants, May 1, 00:07:33
- Well, what's your evaluation of the lad, a few years on? (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:59:36
- are you suggesting if Croft was in contract he'd go for less than 700k? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 30, 23:58:20
- Robinson wasn't too bad (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 30, 23:50:44
- like fotheringham (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 1, 00:12:29
- You spelt Bobbinson wrong (n/m) (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, May 1, 00:09:27
- nah, not including you in owt, just bored of the recent (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:56:59
- Not really a devils advocate though is it? Picking holes in games of no consequence at all (NCFC) - lurd, Apr 30, 23:47:31
- "the worth never put a foot wrong brigade" (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Apr 30, 23:48:49
- I really am struggling to see the point of those posts (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 30, 23:47:44
- Jesus christ, that is some memory. (NCFC) - lurd, Apr 30, 23:39:59
- If that's just one game to some people and I'm being harsh (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:37:33
- I tell you what too, that game, I watched Flem lose his marker, and (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:31:55
- ahh, I'll interject slightly here. Watching suctch at left back, whilst jackson was sounde (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:20:31
- He may have saved us (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 30, 22:47:28
- er Jason Jarret anyone? (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 30, 23:06:38
- but he was a free (NCFC) - conkers, Apr 30, 23:15:37
- was he? thought we paid summat for him (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 30, 23:20:07
- Even costing nothing, though, he was a total rip-off. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Apr 30, 23:18:16
- well 10 other clubs have made that mistake! (n/m) (NCFC) - conkers, Apr 30, 23:32:51
- but he was a free (NCFC) - conkers, Apr 30, 23:15:37
- er Jason Jarret anyone? (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 30, 23:06:38
- Getting rid of Jackson wasn't a disaster when we had Fleming and Mackay. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Apr 30, 22:49:54
- oh and dublin and croft 600 (n/m) (NCFC) - conkers, Apr 30, 22:36:21
- a debate which is highly wasted on here for a number of reasons (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 23:18:51
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.