ARRGHHHH FFS pants. I voted for flem that year so let me tell you why.

1) he was, IIRC ever present. Hucks didn't start the season, and missed that short spell between loon and signing.
2) Even then hucks had the odd game he didn't influence. As a CB Flem HAD to have an impact on every single game, its impossible not to.
3)Flem lead the team by being part of a rock solid foundation. It was this foundation that allowed us to play huckerby, allowed huckerby to play freely, and allowed him to have the superb impact on us that he had.

Without hucks or season would have gone nowhere.
I believe without flem (or at least the flem/malky partnership) our season would also have gone nowhere.

You disagree? Fine, we all look at football differently. On sundays i'm a full back, which does colour how i watch a game. I'm aware of how defenders can have a maasive impact on a team, while seemingly doing nothing more than they should do.
That's why I went with flem.

Posted By: megson on March 12th 2009 at 14:10:20


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in