Can one of you City types (Tricky?) explain how it is that Glazer's takeover

will "saddle Man U with ?500m of debt"?

The papers seem to be suggesting that Glazer borrows the money to buy the shares, takes over, and then gets the club to pay off his loans. But (a) that would amount to the company paying to acquire its own shares, wouldn't it? And that's banned in English law; and (b) unless he actually TRANSFERS his own debts to Man U (which would be v difficult) then they remain HIS debts, not the club's - it's just that he would divert revenue from the club which would otherwise be used for footballing purposes towards his own coffers and use it to pay off his debts?

Posted By: Old Git on May 13th 2005 at 10:20:51


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in