Roeder wasn't sacked because of results alone

He was also sacked because of the way he conducted himself around the club, with the media, with the supporters and - importantly - with the players. It is far too simplistic to suggest that another club's model can be applied to us and the relative merits of Brian Laws have absolutely nothing to do with us.

I wanted it to work out with Roeder. In hindsight I now realise and appreciate what every other supporter told us about him.

Posted By: The Judge on February 8th 2009 at 21:50:25

Message Thread

Still can't take seriously that Gunny is our manager (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 8, 20:35:45
- Kin ell - give him a chance! I think he has done very well so far! (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 8, 20:43:11
  - If they're playing for him, then they were playing for Roeder, and that's the issue with (NCFC) - pants, Feb 8, 21:02:44
    - lol at them playing for roeder (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:13:54
      - lol (NCFC) - pants, Feb 8, 21:23:35
        
        He did have a very good point, though... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 8, 21:24:05
        
        I thought we played really well against Sheff utd (NCFC) - pants, Feb 8, 21:27:16
        
        One game though. You didnt see Charlton, did you? Or numerous others (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 8, 21:29:44
        
        It's about current reactions though. If Gunn was in charge against Charlton and the same (NCFC) - pants, Feb 8, 21:36:37
        
        you keep going on about ifs (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:38:38
        
        Things have been pretty good on here recently (NCFC) - pants, Feb 8, 21:45:39
        
        lmao (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:48:07
        
        Spot on (NCFC) - LegendGunnShooter, Feb 9, 08:57:50
        
        Stop wasting yours on me then, if you think like that (NCFC) - pants, Feb 8, 21:49:38
        
        just one last thing (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:52:05
        
        well the stats didn't prove we played really well (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:29:27
        
        They did actually (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 8, 21:37:38
        
        We're in the, bottom line, not roeders fault, not gunns etc etc (NCFC) - pants, Feb 8, 21:28:40
        
        No pants - it's what a few empty vessels do on mboards (NCFC) - The Judge, Feb 8, 21:37:32
        
        I don't agree (NCFC) - pants, Feb 8, 21:43:52
        
        Roeder wasn't sacked because of results alone (NCFC) - The Judge, Feb 8, 21:50:25
        
        well said (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:40:33
        
        Yes. 100% Yes. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 8, 21:39:39
        
        Thats bollocks though. Dont think a handful of people on here are the majority opinion (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 8, 21:32:01
        
        we're in the same position 6 games on (NCFC) - pants, Feb 8, 21:39:30
        
        So should Gunn now be doing better (NCFC) - The Judge, Feb 8, 21:52:30
        
        I wish we could just have stable support (not bums on seats) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 8, 21:59:14
        
        you seem to think this trait is particular only to supporters of NCFC? (NCFC) - Tombs, Feb 8, 22:10:33
        
        I guessed (NCFC) - pants, Feb 8, 22:15:21
        
        you don't "think" you do (NCFC) - Tombs, Feb 8, 22:16:51
        
        i think he does, in fact i know he does, and so should conker (n/m) (NCFC) - micky maguire, Feb 8, 22:20:41
        
        you haven't even fucking watched us under gunn (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:42:13
        
        Like I said, ben warned you and me about this (NCFC) - pants, Feb 8, 21:52:15
        
        To be fair (NCFC) - LegendGunnShooter, Feb 9, 08:54:10
        
        blub (n/m) (NCFC) - micky maguire, Feb 8, 22:18:13
        
        Well I disagree on that i'm afraid. And with that, i'm off to watch Lost! (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 8, 21:40:29
        
        indeed (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:32:57
        
        The form table is worrying me! (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Feb 8, 21:36:00
        
        and that's based on what? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:40:04
    - I think we are playing far better than Roeder's teams to be honest. (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 8, 21:06:15
  - I now wish he wasn't appointed (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 8, 20:53:56
    - Don't worry (NCFC) - Bryan Salad Surgery, Feb 8, 20:57:12
      - I felt like that at sheff utd, thought the right people would do the right things when (NCFC) - pants, Feb 8, 21:31:35
        
        you're starting to turn into a cunt again (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:34:02
      - The rendition of "we love you Norwich, we do" at the end (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 8, 21:03:40
        
        our position isn't dire at all (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:14:45
        
        Of course it is. (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 8, 21:18:31
        
        only to a myopic doom merchant cunt (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:19:28
        
        I can only assume you don't know what 'dire' means (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 8, 21:20:51
        
        i can only assume you're retarded (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:22:39
        
        You assume wrong. Just so you know - (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 8, 21:25:34
        
        calamitous, desperate and terrible (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:27:32
        
        splitting hairs... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 8, 21:30:34
        
        Dire is accurate enough for me. ie Very serious. (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 8, 21:29:10
        
        and this all happened cos of yesterday? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:30:52
        
        Who said it's as a result of yesterday? Not me. (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 8, 21:36:13
        
        i said it wasn't dire (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:41:11
        
        "Chose the word"? Wrong again. (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 8, 21:44:48
        
        cheers darling (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:48:33
        
        Keep personal attacks out of it. Perfectly good discussion without. (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 8, 21:20:19
        
        well i only asked him a question (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:21:20
        
        Statistically speaking, I think it is. Splitting hairs though, really. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 8, 21:15:54
        
        1 defeat in 5 (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:17:52
        
        Me saying, "splitting hairs" was a polite way to end the discussion... (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 8, 21:19:28
        
        i'm not trying to prove anything (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:20:17
        
        Just in your opinion... (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 8, 21:21:21
        
        they have small brains? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 21:22:07
    - Best hope there aren't many defeats then (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 8, 20:57:05
  - Point 3 is the one I am consoling myself with most (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 8, 20:45:49
    - And actually we aren't bottom. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Feb 8, 20:54:33

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.