Well...

Of the current Championship teams you have named 3 who have found decent players, which presumably means there are 21 who haven't.
Roeder signed several players on permanent terms and no doubt would have added to them next year, but when he took over we were woefully short and Grant had spent the money.
It wasn't Roeder's transfer policy that was the problem, it was the fact that everyone hated him.

Posted By: Bryan Salad Surgery on February 2nd 2009 at 23:22:13

Message Thread

After we Critizised Roader for bringing so many loan players (General Chat) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 2, 22:16:16
- "we" (General Chat) - Tombs, Feb 2, 22:43:56
  - What pisses me off (General Chat) - Bryan Salad Surgery, Feb 2, 22:48:18
    - Then you get a Lita, who didn't give a shit really, but still got on with his job (General Chat) - pants, Feb 2, 23:16:49
    - easy slag off intut (General Chat) - Tombs, Feb 2, 22:53:27
- Seems simple enough to me - (General Chat) - KentonCanary, Feb 2, 22:39:17
  - But that is exactly the position Roeder was in (n/m) (General Chat) - Bryan Salad Surgery, Feb 2, 22:44:36
    - I'm not so sure about that - (General Chat) - KentonCanary, Feb 2, 23:13:41
      - Are you a new fan btw? (General Chat) - Bryan Salad Surgery, Feb 2, 23:23:33
        
        No I'm not a new fan (General Chat) - KentonCanary, Feb 3, 06:12:54
      - Well... (General Chat) - Bryan Salad Surgery, Feb 2, 23:22:13
- Blimey, err (General Chat) - CB41, Feb 2, 22:26:35
- It's the boards fault not Gunn's (General Chat) - Ben, Feb 2, 22:25:48
  - I'm with you on that now. They've hired and fired for years now (General Chat) - pants, Feb 2, 22:31:50
    - our turnover of managers last 8 years has been tiny (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 22:51:03
      - Is that stat relevant? (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Feb 2, 23:02:20
        
        yes (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 23:09:23
        
        What was the 8 years bit about then? (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Feb 2, 23:19:32
        
        low turnover (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 23:54:57
        
        So a bit like Reading didn't beat us for 85 minutes at the Madjeski? (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Feb 3, 00:22:59
        
        no nothing like that (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Feb 3, 00:27:09
  - Hoorah!!! First "sack the board" post for, what, two days? (n/m) (General Chat) - CB41, Feb 2, 22:27:18
- And scottish players too "no more loans" "no more scottish shit" (General Chat) - pants, Feb 2, 22:24:50
  - I think the obvious answer which I'm starting to realise, is fans will say anything (General Chat) - pants, Feb 2, 22:28:25
- I think anything not associated with Roeder is a positive frankly. (n/m) (General Chat) - shoddy, Feb 2, 22:22:25
  - but "all them fukern loons" was official Roeder policy, we all know that for sure don't we (General Chat) - Higher Wrather, Feb 2, 22:48:54
- The team is being managed by people the fans love, so the composition of the squad (General Chat) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Feb 2, 22:21:10
  - I'm probably way off-beam here (General Chat) - Bryan Salad Surgery, Feb 2, 23:26:56
- We're fickle (n/m) (General Chat) - Buckscanary, Feb 2, 22:17:56

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.